Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New worm crawling through blogs ?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 06:28 PM
Original message
New worm crawling through blogs ?!
January 26, 2006 2:06 PM PST

I spotted it on Christopher Boyd's Vital Security blog. Chris is a Microsoft security MVP and security research manager at FaceTime, an instant messaging security company. However, this worm appears to have spread much further and has slithered around the world.

The worm is actually an animated GIF image. Bloggers all over have embedded it in their blogs and link to the creator's Web site. If you want to see the blog worm, go to Chris' blog or go directly to the source.

To infect your blog, you have to copy and paste a piece of HTML code into your blog.

I think this is kind of funny. On the flipside, however, there could be some security implications if the hoster of this "worm" decided to upload a malicious image that took control of the PC's that visit sites that show it.

http://news.com.com/2061-10789_3-6031795.html?part=rss&tag=6031795&subj=news

to see the worm (completely harmless) :

http://www.moox.nl/blogworm/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the info. Mind if I don't go to the link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's completely harmless
it's just a link that links to an animated gif (or else it wpouldn't be on CNET). But the interesting thing is that such a "prank" could become malicious if you embedded code into the image, which on the other hand is more difficult to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was being silly. Just trying to lighten the day. Thanks for the warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It'd be especially difficult to get the code to execute,
without additional payload that acts as an interpreter to the code embedded in the image. The additional payload would be a dead give away that something's up with the cargo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC