Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA offers early target date for spaceship (AP/CNN) {replace STS}

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:00 PM
Original message
NASA offers early target date for spaceship (AP/CNN) {replace STS}
Wednesday, April 26, 2006; Posted: 9:58 a.m. EDT (13:58 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A new spaceship could be ready to replace the nation's aging shuttle fleet by 2011 -- three years ahead of schedule -- if lawmakers added money to NASA's proposed budget, the head of the space agency told a congressional panel on Tuesday.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said that date is the earliest the new spaceship, or crew exploration vehicle, or CEV, could be developed no matter how much money the agency received.

Currently, the target date for building a new vehicle is 2014.

With his pitch to Congress, Griffin underscored a point he has made previously about completing the spaceship on a faster time frame.
***
more: http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/04/26/nasa.budget.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmileyBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. That old space shuttle should've been scrapped years ago.
It's completely obsolete. Here's to hoping Congress will add money to its budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Should have kept to the original design...
It was slightly simpler and cheaper, but the Military had to get a hold of it, and they, being the paragons of effeciency :sarcasm:, made the damn thing look like it was designed by bureaucrats, which it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They needed that huge payload bay to lift weapons.
This was the Cold War still.

They wanted to be able to use it to deploy on-orbit nuclear weapons and missile interceptors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Polar Orbits
Ya it was designed to go into polar orbit to deploy large recon sats.

Never got to do that tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dear NASA: Don't hold your breath.
Emperor Bush gave you an order, which you must obey. However, he has no intention of funding that order. Which you must still obey.

Now, get to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC