|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science |
Loisenman (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:31 AM Original message |
Karl Popper as the 'Ultimate Warrior' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. I believe that in their prioritization of inductive knowledge over deductive knowledge, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. What you don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Don't display your ignorance. He based his proof on mathematics, Dumbo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It's amazing how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That best you can come up with? Mysterious invocations of mathematical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. I have things to say to this as well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duncan (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. I wouldn't bother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Few scientists bother "repudiating" God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Apart from cosmology. The source of the Peculiarity is a closed book to them, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loisenman (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Popper is actually proposing a much broader review of science than he is generally associated with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-27-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Deleted message |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. The supposition that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-28-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Deleted message |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-29-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That was a very penetrating and detailed rebuttal, for which I shall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. You keep using the term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Semantics, Dum Dum. Means the same. I leave pedantic concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Not semantics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. See who wins.... You're not bright enough to argue with, and I don't need to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I'm sorry for descending into snide remarks, but it's difficult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I wonder why it never seems to strike scientists as odd in the extreme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Sorry about the typos. "unsurringly" should be "unsurprisingly." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yay! I have answers for you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Thanks for responding. When you gonna make a single-cell living organism, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 03:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Oh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No. It wasn't a slip of the tongue. Why would it be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. if your really want to me to continue with this discussion, I'll have to insist on your addressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 01:32 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I'm a little young to be a lecturer. :) One day, though. Maybe. If I don't choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Well, I'll tell you what.... you tell me what the universe is expanding into first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Hello! I'm back from holidays! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. This is such fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 02:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Anyway, now that that singularity mewhatsit is out of the way, the rest of the post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. No. I know it. Here is some pabulum for you to consider, though I doubt: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. The most incisive article relating to epistemology and science is reached via this link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-20-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. What I've said is not entirely fair to you. You're a kid, and there is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-21-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. In case you are interested, here is a whole swag of articles, most of them, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-25-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. "...Wittgenstein's utter piffle." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. You really have to be spoon-fed, don't you.? Dumbos I had known... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Name calling is childish and, actually, quite pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 11:01 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. So true. Which in itself is reason enough to ignore this guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. You're right. I shall try to ignore him. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Not silly...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. You are silly and condescending and WRONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. Guess what I'm going to ask you for - ask all of your sources for - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. If the "most incisive" article relies on strawmen and the "you find a watch in the woods" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Random_Australian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-29-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. I read them. The first one was a standard media article, the second one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. Human knowledge is of no cosmic significance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I'd have put it the other way, the cosmos is not of no significance at. all. in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loisenman (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-28-08 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
40. New URL for Popper piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC