Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hard Drive Recovered from "Columbia" Shuttle Solves Physics Problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:43 PM
Original message
Hard Drive Recovered from "Columbia" Shuttle Solves Physics Problem
Not bad at all... recoving data from a four-year-old hard drive dropped from a couple dozen miles up. And surviving re-entry, to boot!

Hard Drive Recovered from Columbia Shuttle Solves Physics Problem

An experiment that flew on the Columbia shuttle achieves closure
By JR Minkel

Researchers have finally published the results of data recovered from a cracked and singed hard drive that fell to Earth in the debris from the Space Shuttle Columbia, which broke up during reentry on February 1, 2003, killing all seven crew members.

The hard drive contained data from the CVX-2 (Critical Viscosity of Xenon) experiment, designed to study the way xenon gas flows in microgravity. The findings, published this April in the journal Physical Review E, confirmed that when stirred vigorously, xenon exhibits a sudden change in viscosity known as shear thinning. The same effect allows whipped cream and ketchup to go from flowing smoothly like liquids to holding their shapes like solids.

<anip>

After the reentry, Berg says, when it was not immediately recovered, "we assumed that it fell out of the cage and burned up and that was it." But engineers from Johnson Space Center had actually found the apparatus in the hanger at Kennedy Space Center where workers had laid out the Columbia debris, says James Myers of the Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, the project's lead engineer.

When the Glenn engineers learned that the hard drive had indeed survived, they sent it to Ontrack Data Recovery in Minneapolis to extract whatever data remained in the cracked hard drive disk . The data came back about 99 percent complete, but the results were so complex that isolating the shear-thinning effect took an additional several years, Berg says.

<more>

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=hard-drive-recovered-from-columbia&sc=rss






Let's hear it for forensic data recovery! :woohoo:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pretty impressive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. We need to get that foresenics discovery team to work on the WH computers
to recover the data of the "missing" e-mails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. My thought exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. so this tells me that if I want to destroy my hard drive
I need to run over it with a mac truck, break it into thousands of little bits and then burn it. x(

;) Pretty cool they were able to recover this. Did the shuttle crew get the credit on the published report?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's actually not far off from what I've seen done in the past.
At one military facility I've seen, secure hard drive & backup tape destruction is accomplished by first running them through a degausser, then driving a tank over the drives and tapes, then shoveling the bits into a ditch and dumping a hundred or so gallons of gasoline into the ditch and torching the whole thing. If that doesn't render data unrecoverable, I don't know what would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The degausser is a good idea, but the rest is a unnecessarily massive amount of work...
They could simply torch the thing with thermite and be done in seconds.

As an aside, if you do a YouTube search for "challenger disaster", you'll find 'rare footage' captured by an Apache helicopter during the breakup. I'd never seen that before...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioINC Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds expensive
I wonder how much government cash was spent to determine the viscocity of Xenon gas in space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. peanuts compared to what it burns in Iraq
and it doesn't turn the US into a global pariah, either. And I think it's a perfect legacy for the lost crew, even if it does cost some money.

Not that I can't think of better ways to spend money than on many shuttle experiments!

I'm sure the data recovery company will get a lot of business with this feather in their cap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I have a friend who really hates the space program
She supported the war until about three years in. Go figure. I guess that's about what to expect from someone raised in a Republican household.

Shuttle missions wouldn't be my priority in world with so much disease and starvation, but at least they don't exacerbate the problem. I don't think most people understand the scope of what the U.S. has wrought in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Actually they do some really interesting biology/physiology/disease research
In zero G. There is some thought that zero g applications might be therapeutic for some conditions. The idea that the experiments done up there have no practical applications is kind of a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. 7 dead people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. But nothing useful survived the four 911 crashes. Right. Tell me another. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Space shuttle technology is a bit more sophisticated
than the technology in airplanes....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. No, that's a perfectly-ordinary "COTS" disk drive with added shock-mounts.
COTS = Commercial Off-the-Shelf

In other words, the same stuff you and I could buy,
with some extra shock-hardening added on externally.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. practical applications?
Anyone have a clue? Isn't xenon a noble gas? Doesn't sound particularly useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not every experiment is specifically meant for consumer applications from day one. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. well sure, but that doesn't make it less fun to think about
But I don't really grasp ultra-new stuff like this very well. A few examples can help a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Definitely. I suspect Xenon was chosen because it is a noble gas.
Thus various complicating (electro)chemical effects would not be present in the experiment.

As for applications: Fluid mechanical couplings, brakes, clutches would be a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC