Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA Scales Up 1966's Moon Image to Amazing Ultra-High Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:56 AM
Original message
NASA Scales Up 1966's Moon Image to Amazing Ultra-High Resolution
This is pretty neat...

NASA Scales Up 1966's Moon Image to Amazing Ultra-High Resolution
By Jesus Diaz, 9:19 PM on Sun Nov 16 2008

When NASA released this image from their Lunar Orbiter 1 back in 1966, the first photograph ever of the Earth rising above the Moon's surface, it was low resolution but they still amazed the world. This week, they have surprised every space aficionado re-releasing the same image in ultra-high definition. The cool part now is that NASA hasn't used any upscaling or magical infinite zoom-in filter from CSI. Instead, they have created a new technology that uses refurbished analog machines and a new digital process that fully extracts the information stored in the program's old magnetic tapes, something that was impossible to do in the 60s.

The Lunar Orbiter missions included five spacecrafts dedicated to map the entire lunar surface, a task necessary to select the landing sites for Apollo. The first three missions focused on twenty potential landing sites, while the two last ones—which flew high altitude polar orbits—took photographs of 99% of the surface with a resolution that ranged from 60 meters to an stunning 2 meter.

While these probes were not as sophisticated as the HD cameras of the Selene spacecraft developed by the Japanese space agency, the NASA orbiters had a clever imaging system that achieved similar results four decades ago. It included a dual lens camera—one 610 millimeter narrow angle for high resolution and an 80 millimeter wide angle for medium resolution—, a film processor, and a scanner. Both lenses were aligned to expose the same part of the 70 millimeter film roll, so the high resolution image area was centered with the medium resolution area.

<more>

http://gizmodo.com/5089936/nasa-scales-up-1966s-moon-image-to-amazing-ultra+high-resolution



The pic is amazing. 3,673 tall x 1,740 wide. I think I see Nova Scotia underneath the clouds there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nah, it's a photoshopped fake, done on a 3/4 scale studio in Fall's Church NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They don't help themselves by 'losing' the high res original landing footage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's a joke, right?
You're not actually implying that the moon landings were faked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. My favorite lunar image
is the mosaic of the lunar south pole taken by the Celmentine probe in 1994.

Mosaic of 1500 Clementine images of the south polar region of the Moon. These images were taken through the red filter of the UV/visible camera. This image shows the south pole at the center and extends to 70 deg. S latitude at the edge, a distance of about 1250 km across the image. This region is dominated by a major depression centered near the south pole, resulting in shadowed areas. The 320 km diameter crater Schrodinger is near the edge of the image at 4:30. (Clementine, USGS slide 17)

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/clm_usgs_17.html (3000px × 3000px)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC