Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Crazy Scientist wants to shoot mirrors into space using giant cannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:07 AM
Original message
Crazy Scientist wants to shoot mirrors into space using giant cannon
Scientists to stop global warming with 100,000 square mile sun shade
Scientists claim they can fight global warming by firing trillions of mirrors into space to deflect the sun's rays forming a 100,000 square mile "sun shade".

Last Updated: 8:12AM GMT 27 Feb 2009

According to astronomer Dr Roger Angel, at the University of Arizona, the trillions of mirrors would have to be fired one million miles above the earth using a huge cannon with a barrel of 0.6 miles across.

The gun would pack 100 times the power of conventional weapons and need an exclusion zone of several miles before being fired.

Despite the obvious obstacles - including an estimated $350 trillion (£244trn) price tag for the project - Dr Angel is confident of getting the project off the ground.


more:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/4839985/Scientists-to-stop-global-warming-with-100000-square-mile-sun-shade.html

Methinks Dr. Angel has been reading too much Jules Verne lately.... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is why I'm not in charge of anything important
...I would fund this in a heartbeat. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. "a huge cannon with a barrel of 0.6 miles across"? I don't think that's the 'across' I'd use
I'd say 'across' means 'diameter', with a cannon. And I don't believe for a moment they'd use something that wide. "0.6 miles long", I'd say. Since they go on about getting electrocuted by the model, I think this must be a rail gun or similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think you are correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. ...and the recoil kicks us into the asteroid belt.
Think it through, Doctor, think it through. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't like the idea but for real reasons
this is a real initiative, by the way, Jules Verne or not.

On the surface, costs aside, it's a great idea.

shoot a bunch of super-thin lenses into a lagrange point to deflect a certain percent of the suns rays and reduce global warming.

But here's the catch: if a meteor or comet blows through the swarm or it fails to deploy properly or it does the opposite: too much sunshade reduces crop viability or causes cooling but other changes in ocean or jet stream we have a pretty big expensive problem.

What bothers me about the solution is that it is a bandaid on a symptom. If we don't address the real underlying cause, which is a buildup of CO2 in our atmosphere, and the sunshade stops working after a couple of years we have INSTANT global warming.

Far better to look a permanent change in how we live on this planet: taking care of our environment, investing hundreds of billions in low carbon footprint technology and living, and creating industries with jobs that leverage the spinoffs of that research.

I'm against the mirror solution for that reason - it's not the "only" viable solution on the table and in a competition it's less considerably less effective than other less expensive and less risky solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I think we need both "bandaids" *and* permanent solutions here
It's not a one-or-the-other thing. Stop the bleeding and then reattach the limb.

A near-Earth meteor would be a speck to something like this anyway; anything big enough to do serious damage to it would flatten hemispheres anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. One has to wonder how much warming would be caused BY the project. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't laugh. They might do this in order to direct the mirrors into a weapon... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Nah. It's just a bad idea
Wouldn't really make a very good weapon, certainly not for the effort that would go into it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is it April 1, already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this guy Killface?
Frisky Dingo reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. And we jeer guys who drive Hummers.
Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's too bad Gerald Bull was assassinated
Edited on Sat Feb-28-09 03:37 PM by bananas
He'd be able to do it:

Gerald Vincent Bull (March 9, 1928 - March 22, 1990) was a Canadian engineer who developed long range artillery. He moved from project to project in his quest to economically launch a satellite using a huge artillery piece. To this end he designed the Project Babylon "supergun" for the Iraqi government. He was assassinated by a gunman outside his home in Brussels, Belgium.

<snip>

The most common theories are that either the Israeli Mossad was responsible (due to the small-caliber, sound-suppressed pistol used), or that it was Iranian Intelligence VEVAK.

<snip>

More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Bull

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC