Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SOLAR MINIMUM VS. GLOBAL WARMING

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:53 AM
Original message
SOLAR MINIMUM VS. GLOBAL WARMING
Edited on Sat Sep-05-09 06:56 AM by Demeter
http://spaceweather.com/ September 5, 2009


From 2002 to 2008, decreasing solar irradiance has countered much anthropogenic warming of Earth's surface. That's the conclusion of researchers Judith Lean (NRL) and David Rind (NASA/GISS), who have just published a new analysis of global temperatures in the Geophysical Research Letters. Lean and Rind considered four drivers of climate change: solar activity, volcanic eruptions, ENSO (El Nino), and the accumulation of greenhouse gases. The following plot shows how much each has contributed to the changing temperature of Earth's surface since 1980:



Volcanic aerosols are a source of cooling; ENSO and greenhouse gases cause heating; the solar cycle can go either way. When added together, these factors can account for 76% of the variance in Earth's surface temperature over the past ~30 years, according to the analysis of Lean and Rind.

Several aspects of their model attract attention: "The warmest year on record, 1998, coincides with the 'super-El Nino' of 1997-98," points out Lean. "The ESNO is capable of producing significant spikes in the temperature record." Solar minimum has the opposite effect: "A 0.1% decrease in the sun's irradiance has counteracted some of the warming action of greenhouse gases from 2002 - 2008," she notes. "This is the reason for the well-known 'flat' temperature trend of recent years."

What's next? Ultimately, the authors say, temperatures will begin rising again as greenhouse gases accumulate and solar activity resumes with the coming of the next solar cycle. Of couse, the solar cycle could be out of whack * ; if solar minimum deepens and persists, no one is certain what will happen. Lean and Rind reveal their predictions for the future here:

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2009GL038932.shtml

Reference: Lean, J. L., and D. H. Rind (2009), How will Earth's surface temperature change in future decades?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15708

* http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/03sep_sunspots.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, I guess the cool summer of 2009 was just an anomaly.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. :(
:(

Deserves to be posted in E&E.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Be my guest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It may mean that we are in for a colder than normal winter. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nah, we are entering El Nino. So we're going to have a warm winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're right. I just checked NOAA. Thanks. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. But the Farmer's Almanac says it will be a cold winter!
Based on their famous Caterpillar-Fuzziness-Scale. Caterpillar fuzziness this year is the highest they've seen since 1907! And let's not forget the equally accurate Squirrel-Nut-Gatherometer readings :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfloydguy7750 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-11-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC