Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question regarding time-dilation and heat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:16 PM
Original message
A question regarding time-dilation and heat
As relative time changes, does relative heat change as well?

That is to say if I watched a person passing at the speed of light would their apparent heat change as well as their relative time rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heat is a rate of vibrations of atoms.
So it would be presumed in time dilation it would look cold from outside observer.

Since the measure of vibration of atoms would be less.

Or it is easier to say heat is the radiation of energy by vibration, and that would be less.


Probably why people are shown to freeze when going through things in scifi like stargates and stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What about the states of matter?
Edited on Sat Sep-25-10 06:30 PM by Taitertots
Does water moving at the speed of light look like ice or really cold water(EDIT) to an outside observer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Temperature is the average rate of vibrations of atoms, yes. But heat? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is probably totally wrong, but...
Maybe there'd be a Doppler shift of the emitted blackbody radiation, which would look like a change in temp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Heat is an internal property; apparent motion is external
Which is to say that you have to be inside their inertial reference frame if you want to accurately measure their temperature. If you are external to it, then the light coming at you is red or blue shifted depending on the relative motion. If you know that relative motion and can correct for it, then you can subtract it out and infer the temperature.

I hope this answers the question. Heat and temperature are not the same thing, but are related by the Maxwell relations. If you mean heat, then you may need to know more about the body than just its velocity, things like work and entropy enter into the calculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Updated Explanation: A thought experiment
So, I'm sitting in orbit as a craft comes past me at 99.999% the speed of light. I look at the person in the craft and they are holding a glass of water. How does the relative time difference effect the motion of the atoms in the water glass (temperature)?

I would think it would make it seem as if the water is colder because the atoms would appear to be moving slower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Let's think this through
Edited on Sat Sep-25-10 10:48 PM by izquierdista
If Capt. Picard is drinking a glass of liquid water as he comes at you, do you see a glass of steam? And as he passes you and recedes, does it becomes a glass of ice? --No.

The temperature of the water is determined by the motion of the water molecules in their own inertial reference frame. When you look from one frame into another, you are going to see properties as they are in that frame. I would say that you can't use relativity to change intrinsic thermodynamic properties as viewed from another frame. Extrinsic properties sure; the volume of the object as it approaches and recedes from you will have its dimensions changed.

Good question, I wish I could hear Feynman's answer to it.

on edit: It's late and I got my red and blue shifts mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Relativistic Thermodynamics
<Physics News Update | American Institute of Physics>
Number 843 #1, October 19, 2007 by Phil Schewe
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2007/split/843-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC