Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting article on construction of James Webb Space Telescope

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:58 PM
Original message
Interesting article on construction of James Webb Space Telescope
ScienceDaily (Sep. 28, 2010) — Imagine building a car chassis without a blueprint or even a list of recommended construction materials.


In a sense, that's precisely what a team of engineers at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., did when they designed a one-of-a-kind structure that is one of nine key new technology systems of the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM). Just as a chassis supports the engine and other components in a car, the ISIM will hold four highly sensitive instruments, electronics, and other shared instrument systems flying on the James Webb Space Telescope, NASA's next flagship observatory.

From scratch -- without past experience to help guide them -- the engineers designed the ISIM made of a never-before-manufactured composite material and proved through testing that it could withstand the super-cold temperatures it would encounter when the observatory reached its orbit 1.5-million kilometers (930,000 miles) from Earth. In fact, the ISIM structure survived temperatures that plunged as low as 27 Kelvin (-411 degrees Fahrenheit), colder than the surface of Pluto.

"It is the first large, bonded composite spacecraft structure to be exposed to such a severe environment," said Jim Pontius, ISIM lead mechanical engineer.

more
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100928160958.htm

Can't wait to see the images this beast produces.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rhetorical Bullshit. Designing IS making the blueprints and
creating the schedule of components.

How fucking stupid to talk about it this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have to admit, I don't understand their metaphor
I'm guessing they were asked to design a structure for housing the four instruments without any guide on performance (i.e. stiffness, relative motion, etc.). I'm finding even that hard to believe. At the very least though they had guidance on envelope, total mass, and one would think geometric stability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Popular publishing requirements meets science/technology reporting
is an obvious first place to look in the hyperboly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. design (v.) 1540s, from L. designare
"mark out, devise, choose, designate, appoint," from de- "out" (see de-) + signare "to mark," from signum "a mark, sign" (see sign (n.)). Originally in English with the meaning now attached to designate; many modern uses of design are metaphoric extensions. As a noun, from 1580s, from M.Fr. desseign

IOW, Designers are SUPPOSED to be creative problem solvers who mark the way for those that do things and make things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC