Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pregnant Mother's Diet Impacts Infant's Sense of Smell, Alters Brain Development

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:08 PM
Original message
Pregnant Mother's Diet Impacts Infant's Sense of Smell, Alters Brain Development
You'd better eat your brussel sprouts when you're pregnant if you expect you child to.



ScienceDaily (Dec. 6, 2010) — A major new study shows that a pregnant mother's diet not only sensitizes the fetus to those smells and flavors, but physically changes the brain directly impacting what the infant eats and drinks in the future.

Researchers studying mice found that the pups' sense of smell is changed by what their mothers eat, teaching them to like the flavors in her diet. At the same time, they found significant changes in the structure of the brain's olfactory glomeruli, which processes smells, because odors in the amniotic fluid affect how this system develops.

In her study, Todrank, now a research fellow with collaborator Giora Heth, PhD, at the Institute of Evolution at the University of Haifa, Israel, fed one group of pregnant and nursing mice a bland diet and another a flavored diet. At weaning age, the pups from mothers on the flavored diet had significantly larger glomeruli than those on the bland diet. They also preferred the same flavor their mother ate, while the other pups had no preference.

"Exposure to odor or flavor in the womb elicits the preference but also shapes the brain development," said Todrank, whose work was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health and was published Dec. 1, 2010 in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Pregnant Mother's Diet Impacts Infant's Sense of Smell, Alters Brain Development
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eh
Any mother who has had more than one kid will probably attest to the fact that her children's eating habits are radically different -- even though the mother ate the same things during both pregnancies.

It was true for my two kids, and for countless other families I've known: one kid eats anything, including vegetables; the other eats only rice and chicken. I'll take the anecdotal evidence over this study. Especially when puppies are the subjects.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True.
My mother loved raw onions, which I hated and still hate, and other
foods I dislike as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed.
> Any mother who has had more than one kid will probably attest to the fact that
> her children's eating habits are radically different -- even though the mother
> ate the same things during both pregnancies.

Whilst at the extremes this holds true (e.g., drug/alcohol dependency, inherited
allergies), for most of the curve the child's eating habits is determined by the
environment when they are growing up - i.e., the food opportunities that are
presented to them directly over the following years rather than what the mother
eats during the months before birth.

If the study's hypothesis were to be true, all children in the same family would
have the same dietary preferences ... as you say, anyone in contact with multi-child
families will simply laugh at that suggestion!

> Especially when puppies are the subjects.

FYI: The study was performed on mice ... whose offspring are still referred to
as "pups"!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I suspect this phenomenon is not quite as strong in humans.
But still an interesting finding worth investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC