greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-03-09 11:37 PM
Original message |
A picture is worth a thousand retches. |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-04-09 12:06 AM by greyl
Unintentionally bad pictures of food: www.redbarnfood.com Yum, yum, don't gimme some.
edit: please send any complaints to JeffR for making me cross-post this here. ;)
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-04-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I had to look in their gallery for identification of some of that stuff.
That's what they get for not hiring a food photographer who knew how to make it look appetizing by using fakes, raw food, colored lighting, and the appropriate angle and distance.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-04-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
When I see pictures of food that looks ultra glossy/juicy I can't help but wonder what petroleum product they sprayed it with.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-04-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What the heck was that white blob? Uterus on a cracker?? |
Tangerine LaBamba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-04-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They advertise healthy food - |
|
no trans-fats, and their menu looks pretty nice.
Amateur took the photos. Not that bad, but they could have been better.
Place has a pretty good reputation, though, so I guess the photos don't matter all that much. I'd give it a try, in spite of their sorry web site and lack of trans-fats (the fries won't be good, that's assured).................
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-05-09 07:13 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Someone Tried to Cheap Out on the Website |
|
You get what you pay for.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |