madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 08:08 AM
Original message |
I typed in google, Oklahoma results and this is what I get |
|
whats the deal with this. been happening for a few days now. Yesterday when I asked how to reclaim the 8 gig that xp sets aside for itself I got this too. been other searches that returned this also.
We're sorry... ... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now.
We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the meantime, if you suspect that your computer or network has been infected, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that your systems are free of viruses and other spurious software.
If you're continually receiving this error, you may be able to resolve the problem by deleting your Google cookie and revisiting Google. For browser-specific instructions, please consult your browser's online support center.
We apologize for the inconvenience, and hope we'll see you again on Google.
|
unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
1. 'Oklahoma results' works fine for me. |
|
Did you do anything unusual with cookies?
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. no same as always, turned off |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 09:43 AM by madokie
I have been getting these warnings for a few days now on several other queries. Could it maybe be my security settings??? It all started when I was looking to see if I could find anyone who has hacked the 8 gig that xp uses for some odd reason that does not show up in my computer or anywhere else I've found. Its like I hit a nerve when I inquired about reclaiming that 8 gig of space. What is micro$haft doing with that space on my hard drive??? I'm really starting to wonder and more so as I keep getting these warnings now. I'm on a fresh install of xp home.
:tinfoilhat: maybe needed???
Add: I deleted the google cookies so maybe that'll fix it. Thanks for the help ;-)
|
unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. You want to make sure that you have the updates for SP2 from a naked install. |
|
XP SP2 took care of most of the problems from the early XP days.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. actually I have sp3 rc1 on here downloaded from microsoft |
|
I think the reason it was still happening was because of a cookie issue and I deleted them and so far no more warnings. but why would when I was looking for info on the squirreled away by xp hard drive space did this start???
Oh and on the sp3 rc1 when I first put it on I could see a speed increase in everything this computer is used for which isn't much mind you but I do suggest to check out sp3 for xp. It appears to be a step in the right direction for xp to be going. Thanks UHC ;-)
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I got that a lot myself last night for really weird things, or I should say, very common things. A search for a single word resulted in that. I ignored the page that comes up, went back to the main google page, then typed it the search term again. That time I had no problem.
It seems almost random.
I knew Google had this "feature" and that it is triggered by certain combinations and manners of entering search terms. I am guessing -- purely a guess -- that they've been working on the mechanism for this and that it has become a bit twitchy for the moment.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. only for the last few days has I seen it |
|
My neighbor and I was talking about the 8 gig that xp squirrels away and I said I'd do a google on it and when I did thats when it first started and it happened several times after wards on things I'd googled before without a hitch. I deleted my google cookies this morning and so far I haven't seen it again. OT, but Google just bought 800 acres just across the road from us here and are in a hell of a construction project that rivals anything any of the construction workers that I've talked to say they've ever been on. 24 giant generators, we're talking locomotive sized diesel engines turning them. A huge water line. They are definitely up to something is all I know. Thanks for letting me know it isn't only me having the problems I had, I don't feel quit so paranoid now.
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I was glad to see your note too ... |
|
I was about to get irritated. Well, I am irritated a bit, but it's nice to have company. :-)
Mean to add this initially. It's definitely not a service pack or even a Windows issue. Happened on my Linux box using both Konqueror and Firefox.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. so was it with puppy with seamonkey |
|
I've been playing around with my xp using nlite and have a new install so when google was acting foolish I booted puppy and sure enough I had the same problem with it too. Do you know if anyone has hacked into the extra 8 gig that xp hides from us by any chance. I sure would like to know what they are using that HD space for. Why must they hide it???
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I am unfamiliar with this.
Are you certain it isn't a hidden partition set aside by the company that originally built the system? (Can't remember if you built this system yourself or not.)
There's a certain amount of space that ends up not being used when one installs Windows. I can't remember what the size of that space is ... been too long since I've installed Windows and paid attention ... but it's not nearly that much.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |