Psychic query about the most recent "terra" plot

[MorningGlow]

Hi all,

While I'm not a regularly practicing psychic, I am a sensitive--I don't get regular messages from the Great Is, but when I do get certain inklings, they are really strong and usually correct. I was wondering if anyone else had the feeling I did yesterday, when I heard the news about the supposed foiled "terra" plot.

First of all, let me go on the record to say that I feel the story is total B.S. As soon as I heard about it, my gut reaction was "this stinks"--not "oh gee how awful there was another plot" but instead "what a load of horse doody".

Anyway, after that first impression, my next thought was "they are trying to isolate us"--trying to keep us from traveling to other countries, trying to keep us isolated and insular. By harping on air travel as the target of supposed terra attacks, and with hardly any ship travel to speak of (place to place instead of cruises, I mean), they want us to give up and stay put.

Does anyone else get that impression? And if so, to what end? Do they want us ignorant of the rest of the world and do they want us to stay away from countries where we can find out a) the truth, as their news media haven't been as tainted as ours and b) that the rest of the world despises and disagrees with us?

Any psychic impressions most welcome. Thanks!

[japple]

1. I got the same feeling, though it's difficult to say whether

it was a psychic impression or cynicism. They are so desperate to get the focus off of Iraq, the crisis in Lebanon, and trying to cover up all the rest of their evil deeds.

[hippiechick]

2. What made it fishy for me

... was why yesterday ? Scotland Yard has said they've had at least one person in custody for a week already ... why the big brou-ha yesterday ?


:shrug:

[mother earth]

3. My feeling is that you don't have to be psychic to see through

all of the efforts to publicize and exploit each and every situation to show us how well we are "protected", all the while they probably fabricate all of these themselves. I have grown cynical of these terror threats. (Can you tell ;)?) I am reminded of Sibel Edmonds, and know that until whistleblowers like her can speak freely, we will forever be at the mercy of these "terror scares".

The truth is plainly in sight & yet these tactics appear to work for them with some people.
I am grateful that the more they spew this stuff, the more the light is shining and people are waking up and seeing it for what it is.

[Grateful for Hope]

4. I was thinking something similar

Does anyone else get that impression? And if so, to what end? Do they want us ignorant of the rest of the world and do they want us to stay away from countries where we can find out a) the truth, as their news media haven't been as tainted as ours and b) that the rest of the world despises and disagrees with us?

For instance, I heard that 63% of Canadians do not believe the 9/11 official story. Other parts of the world are not subjected to the propaganda from our corporately-controlled media.

[Why Syzygy]

5. If that is the intent >

I think it has worked on me. My son is getting married in Finland this autumn, and I don't think I will go. I have panic attacks driving in my own city sometimes, and the thought of being on the other side of the planet and 13 hours in a flying tube is disconcerting.

[Cleita]

6. I do and I believe it's to scare us before the election.

I don't think they dare pull off another 9-11 with the huge loss of life because they know it would make them look like they weren't on top of things like happened during 9-11.

However, thwarting a planned terrorist attack not only scares us but makes them look like they are protecting us, so that we vote against our interests again to be safe. That's their reasoning anyway and their M/O.

[vanboggie]

7. Ditto and I'm not particularly psychic either

It's the same feeling I had as the events of 9/11 were playing out. It's phony, but at least this time they didn't kill people.

Nothing can be taken at face value with the cabal in charge. If they play it up, it's phony.

[rumpel]

8. Agree. Something does not fit the truth.

The night before, in relation to Lieberman, Mom said: watch, Bin Laden will send a message again
The morning news, immediate gut feeling - there we go
The more there is coverage 24/7 - with all those pundits putting their 2 cents - I wonder - Is it really such big news?
Infiltration, arrested people between the ages of 16-30, including a young father expecting his first child -
We'll see.

and this was in Maya Del Mar's Newsletter e-mail:
MAYA'S ENERGY UPDATE
WEEK OF AUGUST 9-15

A ROLLER COASTER WEEK

This is a week of dissemination
of information, much of it
false and misleading. We find
many false starts, mixed
signals, and some confusion.
We may feel restless and
apprehensive. Finding our
inner peaceful place is
a challenge. Look to your
heart for answers. Full Moon
on Wednesday shows a stark
contrast between authoritar-
ianism and democracy.
Combining responsibility
with freedom is the key.

[MorningGlow]

9. Maya seems spot on

I also like "Full Moon on Wednesday shows a stark contrast between authoritarianism and democracy."

What really irks me is that not only did they use this as a distraction (note the timing of the arrests--they'd been under surveillance for a year but were nowhere near ready to go--without plane tickets, even) but also to take away more of our freedom.

I never did understand closing the barn door after the horse was out, anyway. One loony tries to light his shoes on fire, we all have to take our shoes off at the airport, as if the terrrists are going to keep doing the same thing over and over again. Now no liquids on flights, for anyone. And what's up with the no reading material? Are they just trying to annoy us? :wtf:

Seriously, I feel like these past six years have been one long effort to wear us down--the gas prices, the terrrrist warrnings, the Katrina neglect, the economy--all of it.

What I fear is that it may be working. It's incredible what they pull and we just go along with it. Hardly anybody objects. Boiling the frog indeed.

[Mist]

10. I have to agree with others who feel you don't have to be sensitive

to doubt the * administration's proclamations! The timing--right after the Lieberman loss--was fortuitous, no? And yes, I agree that this is to A)Keep the public frightened, and B)to keep the public more isolated from the world. I figured they'd do as much back in '02 or so. They have to do it incrementally--if they were to try to seal the Canadian and Mexican borders overnight, even the densest sheep would wake up.

[yellowdawgdem]

11. I share your suspicions

and my first reaction was bullshit, too. Hadn't thought of the isolation factor, but that could be part of it. The important thing, though, is that I don't think they'll be successful in pulling off too much more of this B.S. Don't know why, but I just think that there will be an end to this chaos.
Though lots of people that I know just swallow it, or pretend to. Americans have always lived in relative comfort- as well as in relative isolation. So I think that we've gotten used to having our creature comforts, and some people will continue to avoid looking at the reality. Then again, it is hard to look at something that is basically out of our control except thru psychic white light.
I hadn't heard of the no reading material rule, is that really so.
It seems to me that airports have been the focus of so many human rights violations- it is the place where they detain people whom they want to imprison. And a way of harrassing leftists they don't like, by giving them a hard time to get clearance to board their plane.
They are certainly making it difficult and scarey for Europeans and Canadians to visit the U.S. What I don't understand is, how can they all be businessmen, and want to destroy our economy by curtailing air travel and tourism.

[MorningGlow]

12. I agree they won't succeed

At least, I fervently hope that will be the case. That's what Matthew always reminds us in his updates--no matter what they plan or expect to implement, they won't succeed. I sure hope he's right!

I don't know the reason, but reading material has been banned on transcontinental flights (British rule):

"Many formerly permitted items had to be stowed in checked baggage. They included not just the gels and liquids banned by the U.S. government, but such staples of transoceanic travel as reading material and electronic devices."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.withdrawal12aug12,0,3072387.story?coll=bal-local-headlines

Sounds downright barbaric to me! That article also says, though, that some security people let passengers take one book on board as long as it's in a ziploc plastic bag. WTF is that about?

[yellowdawgdem]

13. Well, I really don't understand abt reading material

Why that would be problematic in any way. I mean, other than that things can be concealed in books or magazines. But since you can still take a packpack along, that doesn't make too much sense to me. I hope that we do not start implementing these same changes very soon.
Yes, I agree that we will see an end to this regime, and hope it will not take more than 5 years. Mathew seems very sure about it, but he doesn't underplay things either. That it will be a serious struggle.