|
Many years ago, before women had "men" magazines, Cosmopolitan did a nude layout of Burt Reynolds ~ anyone else remember that? For awhile women wanted to have "their" men magazines. At work one day a woman brought a calendar of nude men, so at break, all the women gathered around to look at the man who was the "star" of each month. Of course I went over to look too, but it was more interesting observing the way women behaved looking at those pictures. They were (sort of) acting like men, ooh-ing and ahh-ing over each picture. It did not do a thing for me, and I thought something was wrong with me because I did not even get so much as a tiny thrill looking at those pictures, even though all the women around me seemed to find them sexy. To me they were just a ....picture. It could have been a picture of a house or something, it did not seem to me to be anything special.
In my church was a psychiatrist who was also a sexologist. This is someone who is an expert on human sexuality, plus he was a doctor and a psychologist. He spent a great deal of his time writing, talking, and counseling around this issue. He said there are not many of him because it is hard to study human sexuality, especially human sexual development since they cannot study children's development. This does not mean however that we know nothing about it, just that we do not know much as to what happens between the ages of 0-18 years old psychologically around sexual development.
He led some workshops at a church retreat around the issues of human sexuality in relation to faith. At the workshop, I talked about the calendar at work and how it had not done anything for me. I asked him if something was wrong with me because, well they were just pictures to me but seemed more to my female coworkers. I said, "Don, it was weird, all these women having so much fun and I liked being with the laughing and talking, but to tell you the truth, the pics were a disappointment and I just realized they could have been of a mountain or something, I would have felt the same."
He laughed and told us about a study he had participated in and it revealed a lot to him. He said he studied men and women's strip club behavior, that it was part of his 2nd doctoral dissertation. He said when he went into a men's strip club it was dead silent. The man would more often than not be alone, he would intently watch the dancers and maybe even surreptitiously masturbate. When Don went to a women's strip club, it was completely opposite. It was a big party. Women were laughing and putting money in the guy's trunks, it was definitely a social event where women went together and had fun.
He said the conclusion that was taken from that study was that women's brains are wired differently than men's. Men's brains are wired such that they are more visually stimulated while women's brains are not wired the same. He said that (at that time) his guess was that the women I worked with were behaving like men because they thought that was the way they were "supposed" to act, but if I had asked them, most likely they felt the same way I did. All of the women at that workshop agreed pictures did nothing for them, while the men said they liked seeing pictures of the female form (even a gay man! LOL). I have since had opportunity to ask other women friends and they all say they are just not "turned on" by pics, they are more often turned on by fantasies, sometimes the written word, but never by movies, pictures or the like.
Whereas every man I know is turned on by pictures. I have a friend who spends hours downloading playboy-like pictures and categorizing them, making scrapbooks of specific women, you name it. He is single and this is his thing and he is not hurting anyone. My sons are the same way. I also noticed that they seem to be more stimulated by watching say, superheros or something like that when they were little. Don says this is part of their brains structure.
My point here is that we women can learn about the make-up of males and then perhaps we will not expect men to be like us. The more we make the way they are as somehow being "twisted" and call something they were made to be a "sickness", the more likely we will just make men become secretive and perhaps then it will become a sickness.
We women have our own fantasies and our own way and this is good too. I would not want to be around some man who was like out of a romance novel. And I have found that men who looked at those pictures, but knew that is all they are ~ eye candy, were the men I have found to be the most interesting to me. Thanks to Don, the men who I feel the most comfortable around are men who like me for who I am not because I fit some fantasy. And now I am sorry for women who are determined to look like those picture, to me it is like they are trying to look like a cartoon, now. And men who expect women to be like some ...cartoon are not being realistic about the person they profess to love and they might have some issues. Physical love can be a communion and it can be something to share, but if we women are so self-conscious feeling like we do not fit some cartoon caricature of ourselves, IMO we also have some issues, lol.
Porn addiction is a sad thing, and I believe it can "objectify" women as well as makes them appear we are something we are not. Cindy Crawford said once she could "only wish" she really looked like the airbrushed perfect woman she saw of herself when her pictures were finished. It was a MAN'S fantasy, not who she really was. Those pop-up pics are ads that are appealing to men's eyes in hopes they will let that "direct connection" rule and make a sale. There was a time that 80% of computer usage was men getting access to stuff that they could view without having to expose themselves to the world going out and looking for them at some porn shop. I am not making this up, lol.
These things might be good to keep in mind if you are looking for a partner.
My 2 cents
Cat In Seattle
|