Army Stretching Budget to LimitArmy News Service | C. Todd Lopez | February 29, 2008
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - The Army cannot expect to continue funding its growth, modernization and sustainability using supplemental budgets, Acting Under Secretary of the Army Nelson Ford said Thursday night.
The Army's base budget is substantially short of what is needed to sustain the current force, Ford told an audience of U.S. Army officers, allied nation officers and defense industry officials who were gathered at the Association of the United States Army's Institute of Land Warfare Winter Symposium and Exposition here.
"Our mission exceeds our money," he said. "Of course in the recent past, we do supplementals to cover the shortfalls. That can't be the plan for the future. I suggest we advocate for an increased top line for national defense."
The under secretary was quick to point out that he does not just mean an increase for the Army, but for all services and for other federal agencies called on to perform new missions in support of national defense.
"It is unrealistic for Congress to pass expanded expectations without expanded resources," he said. "And while I am not sure how much to allocate to national defense, I do know we will get the security we pay for. The question is, in a dangerous world, is 3 percent of the gross domestic product enough?"
Rest of article at:
http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,163140,00.htmluhc comment: $735,700,000,000 isn't enough? --> http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=259&topic_id=11462
I think Dave Lindorff hit this notion out of the park --> http://journals.democraticunderground.com/unhappycamper/239