Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lighter body armor issued for Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:24 AM
Original message
Lighter body armor issued for Afghanistan
Lighter body armor issued for Afghanistan
By Dan Lamothe - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Sep 6, 2008 7:23:09 EDT

The Corps has introduced a new alternative to the body armor Marines wear in combat.

Scalable plate carriers, which allow leathernecks to adjust the amount of protection they carry, are lighter than the modular tactical vests, or MTVs, being used now. They have been issued across the Corps and are intended primarily for use in Afghanistan, where the rocky terrain can make carrying the bulky, but more protective, MTV prohibitive, said Capt. Geraldine Carey, a spokeswoman for Marine Corps Systems Command.

“The resultant benefits of lighter weight and decreased heat retention are best suited for operating environments characterized by high elevations, thick vegetation or tropical climates,” Carey said. “The reduced bulk of the vest is also well-suited for the confined spaces combat vehicle crewmen typically operate in.”

The manufacturer, Eagle Industries Unlimited, is under contract to produce 9,483 SPCs, at a cost of about $410 each, with about 5,500 fielded so far, Carey said. She did not say when the rest of the order must be delivered.

SPCs were first fielded in 2007 by the Okinawa, Japan-based 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, which submitted an “urgent universal needs statement” asking for body armor more suitable to tropical environments and mountains, Carey said.


Rest of article at: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2008/09/marine_vest_090508w/%2e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a good move
Although I work with a competitor of Eagle's, they are a great name in the industry and build a very good product. The use of a plate carrier is appropriate in many AO's -- particularly when the primary threat is ballistic and not fragmentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC