Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

School drill team commander faces hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:34 AM
Original message
School drill team commander faces hearing
School drill team commander faces hearing
The Associated Press
Posted : Friday Feb 13, 2009 6:01:58 EST

AURORA, Colo. — A 17-year-old drill team commander for the Young Marines may learn Friday whether she'll be expelled for having the team's mock rifles in her SUV in the school parking lot.

Marie Morrow was suspended for 10 days from Cherokee Trail High School in the Denver suburb of Aurora and could be expelled under a state "zero-tolerance" law governing firearms on school property.

~snip~

Lane says school officials praised Morrow but said their hands were tied by state law. Cherry Creek School District officials say they can't comment.

Morrow is a senior in advanced placement classes with a 3.5 grade-point average and hopes to attend the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, one of five service academies. The Young Marines is a youth leadership program of the Marine Corps League, an organization for current and former Marines.

State Sen. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud, says he plans to introduce a bill in the Legislature next week that would exempt facsimile weapons from the zero-tolerance law.


Rest of article at: http://marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_co_drill_school_hearing_021209/%2e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. This zero tolerance shit
has to go. They were mock drill rifles. We should suspend every student for carrying a pen, they could stick it in some ones eye. More stupid crap from stupid administrators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. leave it to a republican - they just gotta have their guns
I wonder if he would consider a squirt gun, or a plastic gun a "facsimile". How about a real weapon with no bullets? Is that really a weapon or a facsimile until you put in a bullet.

Why don't they seek another way to perform their drills with something other than a fake-gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. If they use it to practice their drills, WHATEVER they use is a fake gun.
It could be a round ball of pink cotton candy and by definition it would still be a fake gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think so
some kid who props a broom over his shoulder will not be disciplined under this rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. 6th-grader's gesture triggers punishment
<snip>
Oklahoma boy gets in-school suspension for pointing finger like gun

Associated Press

MUSKOGEE, Okla. – An elementary school student who pointed his finger like a gun at classmates has been given five days of in-school suspension.
</snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Americans are obsessed with guns. This is fed by an unreasonable and irrational NRA.
If we are erring in our approach to guns in schools - I hope it is an error on the side of restrictions.

I agree it is foolish that this child be given an in-school suspension - but lines have to be drawn somewhere. And I sympathize with those that have to determine where the lines are drawn. It is a no-win task.

I don't know the answer - except whatever rules are put into place, student safety has to drive them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't start moving the goalposts...
i said anything they used could be construed as a fake gun.
you countered that brooms could not be construed as a fake gun.
i countered that in the past a finger has been construed as a fake gun.

don't make the mistake of assuming i'm a pro-gun bambi hunting nazi fetishist nut. cause i'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I made no such claim - do not put words in my posts.
As I said - I have no answer. I firmly believe we need rules that are based on safety. That is all I said.

So who moved the goal posts? Where is your argument that brooms could be construed as fake guns? Are you suggesting that some kid - not necessarily from the drill team - could put a broom over his shoulder and he would be disciplined? Why did you roam from that claim? Why did you move the goal posts? I did not introduce any argument about some kid using his fingers - you did? Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why? My argument is ANYTHING, even a "nothing"...
(such as a pointed finger simulating the physical position of an imaginary "something") can be called a fake gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. but simulating pointing a gun and pulling a trigger is far from "nothing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Correct. It is far from nothing. But it is still A "nothing" with which they are...
doing a "something".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. would you be willing to excuse some bully who simulated
some sexual movements - even though simulated - if directed toward some middle-school girl?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No. And no more so would i be willing to excuse some bully using...
his finger to simulate shooting if i perceived it to be done in a truly threatening manner.

You (purposely?) misconstrue the nature of the disagreement here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. purposely? what are you implying?
so would the sexual intimidation be excused if it were only done as a joke? Something for the bully and his friend's amusement?

It seems you are arguing the rules surrounding weapons need to be based on actual risks and threats. I have a different opinion about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. So you are arguing that rules surrounding weapons should be based...
on imaginary risks and threats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. no - not imaginary - perceived -
by either a "victim" or a "bystander".

to do otherwise would open the door to all types of harassment. There has to be some level of control in the school. Setting up these rules is not a science - but an art. An imperfect one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. so if we allow a child to point his finger at some classmate and simulate
pulling a trigger, would you be willing to allow a group of students to do this toward a selected student? Some group harassment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. What if a group of students pointed brooms toward a selected student?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. if they simulated striking or "pulling" a trigger, then discipline them.
my broom example involved simply putting it over a shoulder. There is no perceived threat with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Ok. Now what if a group of students had pieces of wood carved
into a crude profile of a gun, but they DIDN'T simulate pulling a trigger, or even point it at somebody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think the "appearance" of a weapon can be perceived as a threat by some
this is probably a new phenomena spawned by Columbine or other school incidents - but nonetheless - something that causes a feeling of a real threat among students.

Lines have to be drawn somewhere. A real gun cannot be ignored. A broom in a closet is harmless. Someplace in the middle a line has to be drawn. Wherever that happens - someone will take issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC