Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-27-08 10:05 AM
Original message |
Here's what we should REALLY be worried about: |
onager
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-27-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Sorry I couldn't read all her stuff, but I'm an atheist and know I have a finite life span.
In skimming it, I certainly didn't see anything new. Next she'll be in the local library, demanding that they put The Illuminati Trilogy in the Non-Fiction section.
Jeez. The rich and powerful don't need some hugger-mugger conspiracy. If you have money and power, you can quite openly get away with whatever you want to do. While a lot of the people you're screwing run around looking for the Master Conspiracy behind it all, of course.
|
cosmik debris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-27-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It's like they read Robert Anton Wilson as |
|
Investigative reporting for a documentary.
I wonder how they dealt with the Rehnquist in the Lobster Newburg?
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-27-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Eww, you made me look in there |
|
Now I have to shower, delouse and then bleach my brain.
|
Lost-in-FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Sorry, never went past the 2nd paragraph then fell asleep. n/t |
HamdenRice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-28-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I think you misinterpret her. She is saying "illuminati theory" is bunk |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-28-08 07:39 AM by HamdenRice
She is not promoting illuminati conspiracy theory, but saying it is bunk, and as well, in the Bible belt is being used to slander atheists.
It's an unusual take, but I don't think you can possibly interpret her post as promoting illuminati conspiracy theories.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message |