http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/worst_selfinflicted_campaign_m.phpThis is a great post by James Fallows, where he speculates that McCain's suspension of his campaign & pulling out of the debate may be the "Worst Self Inflicted Campaign Move Ever". But within the post, he talks about the "old" McCain in 2000, who would have been ashamed of the 2008 McCain. Check out these quotes from Larry King when McCain & Bush appeared on the show in 2000:
On February 15, four days before the vote, Bush and McCain appeared together on Larry King Live (along with Alan Keyes, the motormouth former ambassador, who was still in the race). Beneath a smile, McCain was seething. Two weeks earlier he had pulled off a surprising victory over the much better financed Bush in New Hampshire. Bush had responded in South Carolina by attacking McCain mercilessly from the right. On Larry King, Bush and McCain traded complaints about unfair negative campaign ads. Bush's complaint was that McCain had run an ad comparing him to Bill Clinton. "That's about as low a blow as you can give in a Republican primary!" he said.
McCain held a tight smile. "Let me tell you what really went over the line," he said shortly afterward, when asked by King for a reply. At a recent Bush rally Bush had stood alongside someone McCain called "a spokesman for a fringe veterans' group," who had denounced McCain for "abandoning" Vietnam veterans.
With feigned politeness, McCain told Bush, "I don't know if you can understand this, George, but that really hurts. It really hurts." No mention of McCain's service as a military pilot, nor of his imprisonment and torture in the "Hanoi Hilton"; everyone knew what McCain meant. McCain turned to King. "And so five United States senators--Vietnam veterans, heroes, some of them really incredible heroes--wrote George a letter and said, 'Apologize.' You should be ashamed."
Bush sputtered, "Let me speak to that ..."
McCain faced him again, calm but contemptuous: "You should be ashamed."
I had NO IDEA how big a role that letter played! We know that Kerry organized the letter, but I figured it was probably a one day response thing with it being in the papers and on the news. I did not know that McCain used it in a debate, which really elevates its status. Remember this is how it happened:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101040802/Kerry talks all the time about the lessons he learned in Vietnam but rarely about what he did there. The story of how he saved Green Beret Jim Rassmann from the Bay Hap River under fire in 1969 would never have been told if Rassmann hadn't offered to tell it—dramatically, on the eve of the Iowa caucuses. Years ago, three of the Vietnam combat veterans Kerry served with in the Senate—John McCain, Bob Kerrey and Max Cleland—told me something that Kerry had never even hinted at: that Kerry had come to their rescue on occasions when they had been publicly attacked. He organized Op-Ed pieces and television appearances to defend his colleagues; he wrote a letter during the 2000 South Carolina primary, signed by Vietnam combat veterans of both parties, calling on George W. Bush to stop associating with veterans' groups who said McCain had abandoned vets; when Kerrey was accused of participating in a massacre of civilians in Vietnam, Kerry called some mutual friends and had them hang out with Kerrey until the storm passed. "I just love the guy," Kerrey once told me.
I think this shows how much more powerful Kerry's letter was in 2000 than McCain saying the SBVT ads were "dishonest and dishonorable". Kerry did two things that made it more effective:
1. He made sure it was a bipartisan letter from all the Vietnam vets in the Senate. This made it more of a consensus letter -- a conventional wisdom. Instead of just coming from one person.
2. It asked for action: it asked Bush to apologize. McCain NEVER put that kind of pressure on Bush in '04. Therefore when Bush didn't bother condemning the SBVT ads, McCain could continue supporting him, since he never DEMANDED any action from Bush. Believe me: McCain had the power to stop the SBVT in '04. He could have STOPPED them, but that would have been at the expense of his alliance with the Rovians who now run his campaign. So he didn't.