Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JK for Dept of Interior?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:28 PM
Original message
JK for Dept of Interior?
http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2008/11/watch_the_interior_department.html

"Marc Ambinder, the Atlantic's prolific political blogger, says Sen. John Kerry may be in line for a consolation prize now that reports suggest that President-elect Barack Obama wants to make Sen. Hillary Clinton the secretary of state.

Ambinder says that Kerry would happily settle for the Interior Department, an agency of particular importance to those us Way West of the Beltway. The Oregon media, of course, has been talking up the possibility of former Gov. John Kitzhaber as interior secretary. (He's also been mentioned for the Health and Human Services Department).

Appointing the Massachusetts senator would be a departure from the tradition of putting a Westerner in the job, and it would cause some major flurries of anxiety from the natural resource industry. At least with Kitzhaber, they're getting someone they've worked with in the past even if they've had their differences."

I'd bet the natural resource industry wouldn't be thrilled with JK, and thank god for that. He would be a huge sigh of relief in that position - huge. As would Kitzhaber at HHS, although he's always said he won't go to DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Prosense has a post where David Wade has said it is "cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs"
The article is by someone who interviewed Kerry earlier this year. I would assume he would prefer to stay as a powerful Senator. I think Secretary of State was the only thing that would be as good as the Senate seat.

(It was good hearing that Wade is back with him.) http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/11/18/the-restless-mr-kerry.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. lol, and back in rare form too
I love David.

I think our public resources would benefit enormously under JK and that he could do more long-term good there than just about anywhere really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. oh, is that the same one who was Biden's spokesman during the campaign?
I never knew he was a Kerry staffer. That's a great quote :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrafty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah, he's been with JK for years
even though he perpetually looks 22, haha! And he is AWESOME. I think he toned himself down for the pres. campaign - he's funny as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. further proof that Kerry has a sense of humor :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes
He was a long time Kerry spokesperson - includingh in 2004. His announcement (before Biden was named)signaled to me that the VP would not be HRC.

Here was the announcement that he would work for the VP.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/30/AR2008073003186.html

and this in a 2004 NYT article:
"Then there is John Kerry the father figure, who drove an hour after an overseas flight to attend the 2001 nuptials of his press secretary, David Wade, who has not seen his own father since he was a baby."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=273&topic_id=141205
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. thanks.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noisy Democrat Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ye gods, I hope not
Why are so many people determined to make it sound as if JK will be losing out if he stays in the Senate? I, for one, am praying he does stay in the Senate, and becomes chair of SFRC, and becomes an even more powerful senator. Nobody is asking us bloggers what he should do, so it's kind of pointless for us to even talk about it, but I'm glad if he doesn't become Secretary of State. I think his Senate position is very important, and is about to become even more so. It seems as if quite a number of people want to do damage to him by portraying his position in the Senate in a negative light, making it appear that Obama has passed him over, etc.

Seeing the respect Obama has shown for JK, I'm sure that Obama has seriously considered offering JK something, or may even have made an offer. But obviously he's not going to be able to say, "My first choice was John Kerry, but since he wants to stay in the Senate, I had to settle for so-and-so." Unfortunately, this means that it's open season for anyone who wants to claim that JK has been passed over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The forests and rivers are very important to me
I would love for JK to be in charge of them. I don't really care what he wants to do, but I certainly wouldn't say "ye gods, no" if JK were to take charge of our public lands. I would breathe a huge sigh of relief. Perhaps people don't know how bad it is out here, how fragile it all is and how quickly we could be past a point of recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. This could be a good idea. It may be a good symbol to put people who care in these responsibilities
position, but whether it is him or somebody else who cares, it does not seem to be headed this direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I dont disagree with you
but two things:

1) it is a political demotion to go from senate to interior -- especially with a new six year term in hand.
2) JK is more of a fisheries and climate (air) guy, because of the topography of Mass, his efforts on transnational envir issues and the legacy of NE industrialization/acid rain that made this a key issue in the 1980s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I'm in Oregon
so maybe his work on fisheries has special purpose to me, he was one of the first to notice the disaster of the Klamath River and that was well before we had to close our salmon fishing season. The forests was Carole King's key issue in 2004 and I recall that she first became impressed with JK due to his knowledge of the forests, even though he is from Mass. You can't deal with fisheries without dealing with logging, ranching, farming, mining, the land around the water. I wouldn't dream of suggesting JK should do anything in particular, as I stated, I just thought it was an interesting article, an intriguing idea, and a real credit to who the man is that he would be considered viable for so many areas of the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Climate change and energy are going to be big deals in the next Congress
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 11:20 AM by TayTay
and, we all hope, in the next Admin. I should think that the good Senator might want a hand in all of that. He was referred to as the "go-to guy" for climate change. It seems the Senate might be a better perch in which to attend to that than Interior.

Isn't the next round of climate change talks coming up soon? I think there are sessions in Poznan, Poland in December. These are the middle round of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change http://unfccc.int/2860.php">(UNFCCC) discussions that began in Bali last year. I should think the Senate would like to send strong representation this year. (Unlike last year when the Repubs scheduled votes on energy just to complicate things and prevent or delay Senators from going to Bali.)

I still have not completely wrapped my head around the thought that we might have an Administration that takes these talks and the urgency of climate change seriously. That is such a huge change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noisy Democrat Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. The reason I said 'ye gods' is the 'consolation prize' part
JK doesn't need a consolation prize. He's a powerful senator and about to get more powerful. It disturbs me that so many in the media are working so hard to obscure that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Because of the efforts made by the media and his senate colleagues to
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 09:48 AM by Mass
make it look this way.

Look at the reaction of the Senate people when he was thought to be frontrunner for SoS (or rather absence of). Contrast that with the reaction when it comes to Hillary.

AP has an article today explaining how Hillary could get a higher leadership place and how other senators are for it. Compare that to what was said 4 years ago when some were suggesting Kerry would take a higher leadership role in the senate. Remember the snickering of some of his fellow senators (and staff). He took this leadership role. It shows from time to time, but this is definitively not something the media or other senators will recognize. (BTW, here is the article, because, aside the irritation of being about Hillary, it asks a real question. How giving the leadership of the appropriation Committee to Innouye (84) rather than Byrd (92) while many less senior (though full of merit and with already more than one term senators) cannot get a chairmanship or either a full committee or an important subcommittee), but nothing to do with your point.)


So, I think we need to accept that SOME media will never be positive when it comes to Kerry (Maureen Dowd and Gail Collins are the epitome of this, but hardly the only ones). Actually, it has gotten better these last few months, surprisingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. this sounds right to me
especially, unfortunately, the "open season" part. (Check out MoDo's gratuitous mention of the "pompous John Kerry" this morning. Honestly. Part of me wonders whether JK failed some sort of Girl Test because he hasn't flirted -- high-school-girl-wise, or political-Beltway-schmooze-wise -- with Dowd or Collins.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. You might be right - but he won Teresa Heinz
which shows he has better taste and judgment. If there is anyone who is pompous, it is Maureen Dowd, who seems to find fault with everyone else in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. oh, I have absolutely NO doubt that JK has superior taste and
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 09:17 AM by MBS
judgment on all fronts, including especially the spousal dept. :) (That was actually the point I was trying to make, indirectly, in my first comment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. I wonder if Kerry really wants a cabinet position
in fact, I wonder if any of the people that keep getting mentioned, like Richardson, Clinton, Kerry - are really wanting jobs in the administrative branch. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't remember many senators and govornors being tapped for these jobs in the past.

Kerry is poised to become a very powerful figure in the Senate - a Senate that, with the majority we've got and a Democrat in the WH, is in a position to effect some real change.

Same goes for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Hey, nice to have you back
It is a pleasure to see your posts again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrafty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well, wanting is one thing.
But the likelihood of Obama poaching half the Senate to fill his cabinet is far slimmer than the media would suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I'm with you - Unless I missed one, the last Senator was Muskie - under Carter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Secretaries_of_State_of_the_United_States

I agree with you that given everything Kerry is interested in and the committee seats he holds, he is very well positioned to be a powerful legislator. I don't think HRC is positioned anywhere near as well - she is very junior in every committee she is in - the interesting story yesterday was that Kennedy was willing to give her a health task force. This was interesting as it gives her something rather than leaving her with no real power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Bentsen was the last one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonteLukast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hmmm... I've actually heard Ken Salazar.
Now THAT would be exciting. He's very popular here, at the same time as he's too much of a Blue Dog for a lot of progressives. His replacement could potentially be VERY exciting, seeing as how no one knows where our extremely popular term-limited State House Speaker Andrew Romanoff is supposed to go. Romanoff for Senator alongside Mark Udall? Sounds good to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. That would be awesome
Hell, I've been looking for excuses to drop out of grad school. Working on Romanoff's staff might be good enough. On the other hand, Rockymountaindem, PhD sounds pretty good as well :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
26. Marc Ambinder, the source for this rumor, has now pretty much retracted it:
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/the_atlantics_bravest.php

2. Earlier this week, I speculated about John Kerry and the Department of the Interior. Actually, I'd be surprised if Kerry leaves the Senate if he doesn't become Secretary of State.

Not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. there is talk of Richardson offered and/or accepting Sec of Commerce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC