Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry's statement on CAFTA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:05 AM
Original message
Kerry's statement on CAFTA
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Kerry_issues_statement_on__0614.html

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE / CONTACT: David Wade or April Boyd

John Kerry: We Need a New, Common-Sense Approach to Trade Kerry Amendment Would Give Teeth to Existing Labor Standards


Below is a statement by Senator John Kerry from the Senate Finance Committee's mark-up this morning of the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA).

"An Administration's job is to make sure that open markets and robust trade benefit America's workers, consumers, corporations and ultimately our security. This Administration has broken that tradition by negotiating trade deals out of step with the globalized world in which we're living and by refusing to enforce the trade agreements we already have.

"The evidence is clear in what's happening in our manufacturing sector and increasingly our service sector. No small part of that impact is very real hardship for working families. I have listened and learned, and I believe that our trade agreements can and must do a better job protecting American workers and our competitive edge. That's why the Jordan free trade agreement was such an important step forward, and that's why CAFTA fails the new test for trade in a globalized world.

"CAFTA includes two sets of provisions relating to workers: First, it requires that nations uphold their own labor laws, but it makes no stipulation as to what those laws require and includes only token enforcement provisions. Second, it calls on countries to 'strive to' achieve the most basic standards, like the 'elimination of the worst forms of child labor,' but includes absolutely no provisions to enforce these negligible standards. This means that a U.S. worker might well lose his or her job to a facility operating at conditions far, far below what anyone would deem acceptable in the modern economy.

"By contrast, CAFTA provides an elaborate and thorough process of very specific rules, investigation, dispute, appeal and punishment to protect American corporations' economic rights and interests, like intellectual property rights - as it should. The fundamental question is why does CAFTA not provide the same protection for American workers' economic rights and interests? There can be no doubt that CAFTA creates a horribly unfair double-standard that punishes American workers. Citizens do not have the same standing to end child labor or sweatshop conditions that corporations have to end copyright and patent theft - in fact, workers have no standing. Is the Administration really prepared to argue that in a globalized world a corporation's copyright is more important than a worker's guarantee to a safe workplace?

"Today, I will offer two amendments that offer a clear alternative for Senators who believe in free trade and the American worker. The first gives true enforcement power to CAFTA's existing worker protections and the second ensures that all future trade agreements will include similarly enforceable worker protections.

"There's a reason CAFTA is in trouble. There's a reason why so many long time trade supporters oppose it today. It's a bad agreement. The Bush administration should reopen negotiations on CAFTA. It's well worth making progress that, in the end, will protect American companies and workers and set the right standard for free trade."
#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am completely satisfied with this
It corrects everything I had my (admittedly small) problems with on Sen. Kerry's stand on trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Kerry was always for global trade, but with better standards for labor.
As president he would have had the bully pulpit to offer global trade agreements that labor could get behind, too.

I remember when NAFTA was being debated and Kerry offered an amendment that unuin leaders requested their members to get behind. The amendment failed, but Kerry, the global trader, always intended to push labor-friendly agreements through when he had the power to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Was this hearing postponed?
I can't find any boradcast through the usual avenues (caphearings.org or the SFC web site,) Was this closed for some reason? Postponed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This hearing is going on now.,
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:53 AM by TayTay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. More on LUTD
There's more in my post on LUTD that Raw Story does not have - http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=1076
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think they just voted no on the amendments
confusing hearing. (Oh no, not another one of those. Why can't Rethugs govern? They can't run smooth hearings.) The Finance committee voted 11-8 to vote Cafta out of committee. However, at least 7 or 8 of those votes were 'by proxy' and the Finance Comm rules say you can't vote the final bill out of Committee based on 'by proxy' votes. (Why can't REthugs govern?)

Can Sen. KErry resubmit this on the floor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm checking on this
Will let you know what JK's PR person says!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. An amendment lot 10-10, not sure it was Kerry's
My connection to the hearing kept going away. (a/c problems today. It's 125 in the machine room.)

I hope I am wrong. I hope it wasn't Kerry's Amendment that lost 10-10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, it was Kerry's amendment.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=john+kerry&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&sa=N&start=0


The panel also rejected, on a 10-10 vote, a proposal by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., to ensure that labor laws are enforced, and it did not take up suggested amendments to protect the sugar industry from what it perceives as threats from Central American imports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC