Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JK's DSM Letter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:02 PM
Original message
JK's DSM Letter
John Kerry’s office has released a copy of his letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee requesting an investigation of pre-war Iraq intelligence failures (and the Downing Street Memo) to LightUpTheDarkness.org.

June 22, 2005
The Honorable Pat Roberts, Chairman
The Honorable John D. Rockefeller, IV, Vice Chairman
United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
SH-211
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Roberts and Senator Rockefeller:
We write concerning your committee's vital examination of pre-war Iraq intelligence failures. In particular, we urge you to accelerate to completion the work of the so-called "Phase II" effort to assess how policy makers used the intelligence they received. Last year your committee completed the first phase of a two-phased effort to review the pre-war intelligence on Iraq. Phase I-begun in the summer of 2003 and completed in the summer of 2004-examined the performance of the American intelligence community in the collection and analysis of intelligence prior to the war, including an examination of the quantity and quality of U.S. intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and the intelligence on ties between Saddam Hussein's regime and terrorist groups. At the conclusion of Phase I, your committee issued an unclassified report that made an important contribution to the American public's understanding of the issues involved. In February 2004-well over a year ago-the committee agreed to expand the scope of inquiry to include a second phase which would examine the use of intelligence by policy makers, the comparison of pre-war assessments and post-war findings, the activities of the Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group (PCTEG) and the Office of Special Plans in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and the use of information provided by the Iraqi National Congress. The committee's efforts have taken on renewed urgency given recent revelations in the United Kingdom regarding the apparent minutes of a July 23, 2002, meeting between Prime Minister Tony Blair and his senior national security advisors. These minutes-known as the "Downing Street Memo"-raise troubling questions about the use of intelligence by American policy makers-questions that your committee is uniquely situated to address. The memo indicates that in the summer of 2002, at a time the White House was promising Congress and the American people that war would be their last resort, that they believed military action against Iraq was "inevitable." The minutes reveal that President "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

The American people took the warnings that the administration sounded seriously-warnings that were echoed at the United Nations and here in Congress as we voted to give the president the authority to go to war. For the sake of our democracy and our future national security, the public must know whether such warnings were driven by facts and responsible intelligence, or by political calculation. These issues need to be addressed with urgency. This remains a dangerous world, with American forces engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, and other challenges looming in Iran and North Korea. In this environment, the American public should have the highest confidence that policy makers are using intelligence objectively-never manipulating it to justify war, but always to protect the United States. The contents of the Downing Street Memo undermine this faith and only rigorous Congressional oversight can determine the truth. We urge the committee to complete the second phase of its investigation with the maximum speed and transparency possible, producing, as it did at the end of Phase I, a comprehensive, unclassified report from which the American people can benefit directly.

Sincerely,
John Kerry
Co-signers: Sens. Tim Johnson, Jon Corzine, Jack Reed, Frank Lautenberg, Barbara Boxer, Edward Kennedy, Thomas Harkin, Jeff Bingaman, Richard Durbin

http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=1150
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are they leaking this on a Friday "dump "day?
No one will pay any attention! I say it again, there is something seriously wrong with the Kerry PR people! WTF can they be thinking????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Think for a minute
Conyers was not immediately recognized on the media. I can't remember when his petition started but I do not think it was on a Monday. I think Kerry is playing it to the new media the INTERNET, we are the ones that make the push to make it news to the non-existent MSM. Remember it was the Internet that got the DSM going and this IMO is the second push to keep it going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. This has not been released to the MSM or on his website yet...
Exactly right FUIBC. This was a gift to the blogosphere from JK and his press team. They recognize that there are people out here who are pushing certain issues and making the blogosphere hum!

Advance copies went out to many blogs today, so I suspect JK was showing his respect to all who have worked hard to expose this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This was an official leak
To get the internet talking about it over the weekend. The letter probably won't be delivered until early next week. If the MSM covers it at all, it won't be until after it's been delivered to the committee. So today's leak was just to get us (the teeming net masses) all fired up about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You are right on target ROX!
This gets the internet buzzing all weekend:bounce:

By Monday, we will have done our job!

And next weekend is the 4th...so this is perfect timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not everything releases on a Friday dies
Some of those things get talked about in the Sunday gabfests. It is entirely possible that this might be mentioned on one of the talk shows. That would be a nice start.

As this is an 'unofficial' release, a little weekend notice would preceed a genuine press conference, maybe build a little anticipation. That would also be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love all of you.
Just in case I hadn't mentioned it before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right back at ya, kiddo
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 08:17 PM by TayTay
We are all fighting the good fight, each according to how much time their kids let them have the internet. (Not now sweetie, Momma has to save the world. Sigh!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly.
wait 'til your kids are teenagers. big sigh to share computer time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. My kids are adults
One is 20 and home from college and can't understand why she has to share the computer and cable modem with her old lady. (At school, I get to go online whenever I want. What do you want on the internet anyway? I need it to talk with my friends from school.)

Sigh!

My son is 18 and desperately needs it to network games with his friends. Sigh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. i'm surprised he got as many names as he did
not really surprised about Kennedy,Lautenberg and Durbin because he is close to them and i can see them just wanting to show him support.

the one i am really surprised by is Tim Johnson because he is from a very conservative state and likes to appear moderate. Johnson is also the only Senator who has a kid fighting in Iraq right now so that could be part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Isn't Tim Johnson the senator Kerry was talking with Thursday
at the end of his speech denouncing KKKarl? I'm glad he signed this letter for sure. If I had a child fighting in Iraq you're damn right I'd want some answers as to why he/she was there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. This was a courageous move on Sen. Johnson's part
He needs some e-mail love and thanks.

Bingaman of New Mexico is also a great signature to get. New Mexico is a purple state (right?) and it's nice to see Sen. Bingaman looking out for it's citizens and asking for governmental accountability.

Johnson and Bingaman, despite my differences in the past with some of their votes, are showing real courage in backing a call for proper hearings. Kudos and a tip of the hat to them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Where's Hillary? Where's Chuck Schumer?
This is puzzling. They both should have signed. It's just hearings. What could have prevented both of them from signing? This would enhance presidential aspirations by showing that Dems have spine and want an accounting of the governments actions.

I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC