If you haven't seen it, here it is:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6777696/site/newsweek/I've been thinking about that article for a few days; JK was wondering how to speak to and connect with ordinary voters. He said that the pundits didn't like him, and that he failed to connect.
I do think for a lot of people he was simply the Dem candidate who they hoped could take Bush out: he had intelligence, experience, and was a combat veteran. And now they are dropping him and are looking for the next guy that will lead them to the promised land. They didn't connect on a personal level.
Why? maybe his complexity. John is a complex person and not easy to understand at first glance. Not easy to know from a sound bite. And most are just too lazy to pay more attention.
As for the pundits: he's not easy to pigeonhole--that's why they're uneasy with him. Whatever they think he is, he turns out to be someone different. Too intense, too serious for the info-tainment shows. I've seen him interviewed by Chris Matthews where CM was clearly outgunned and he knew it--and Matthews likes to be able to come out on top. JK's too smart for them, and he won't play your games with you. So he isn't a good fit on these shows, as long as he is trying to make some serious points. They don't want that--they want entertainment. I thought he was fine on Letterman and the Daily Show---but that isn't enough coverage. Maybe he should have been Mr. Entertainment first and foremost, and not tried to make any serious points. Maybe it is more about personallity than policy when you are running for president. The repub candidate(who shall remain nameless here) certainly didn't strain himself by trying to talk about any issues in detail! But then he was the incumbent and we knew him already.
These days a candidate has to be such a showperson--like they have to go on TV and juggle fruit, twirl a hoop on one leg, and whistle Dixie at the same time! John's style would more easily fit into the days when politicians were merely expected to be smart, serious and responsible! He does better in person than on TV, because he is a gentle soul, really, and it doesn't translate as well on TV.
Then there are us "intensely loyal" followers! Why? We each can have our own reasons. For me, it is his sincerity. He really cares, and this comes across to someone who is paying attention. I mean, I liked Al Gore, for example, because I liked what he said, but I didn't connect with him. He tried to change himself to fit what people wanted, and it came off as insincere. I didn't think I really knew the man, you know? Or Bill Clinton either. Couldn't 100% believe him.
But when John Kerry says something, I believe that he means it to his core. And he is also obviously very intelligent and capable, and that gave me a lot of confidence that he could be a great president. He is simply a really good man! And I think that is why people like us don't want to lose sight of this guy--and want to keep following his lead. You don't find someone you can totally trust in politics very often. I think that's why his true followers stay loyal.
So I'm wondering, what advice you would give to JK and his advisors now? If he is going to run for president again, he'll have to convince all those Deaniacs, etc. that he can do it again and win bigger this time--and it won't be easy, if those other forums are any indication! How can he change anything, and not look like a phoney? I do think he was doing much better at the end of the campaign--his success helped him come out of his shell with more confidence.
And maybe this article is all hogwash--a first explanation of what went "wrong" and, and he and his advisers don't believe this anymore?