Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strenthen Earned Income Tax Credit, Kerry bill 10/5

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:05 AM
Original message
Strenthen Earned Income Tax Credit, Kerry bill 10/5
Now that's a Democrat. Sigh! We shall see if it gets out of committee, but damn, That's a Democrat.

Strengthen the Earned Income Tax Credit Act of 2005 (Introduced in Senate)

S 1824 IS

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S . 1824
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to strengthen the earned income tax credit.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

October 5, 2005
Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to strengthen the earned income tax credit.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Strengthen the Earned Income Tax Credit Act of 2005'.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHEN THE EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT.

(a) Reduction in Marriage Penalty-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 32(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to joint returns) is amended by striking clauses (ii) and (iii) and inserting the following new clauses:

`(ii) $2,000 in the case of taxable years beginning in 2005,

`(iii) $3,000 in the case of taxable years beginning in 2006,

`(iv) $3,500 in the case of taxable years beginning in 2007,

`(v) $4,000 in the case of taxable years beginning in 2008,

`(vi) $4,500 in the case of taxable years beginning in 2009, and

`(vii) $5,000 in the case of taxable years beginning after 2009.'.

(2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Section 32(j)(1)(B)(ii) of such Code is amended--

(A) by striking `$3,000' and inserting `$5,000', and

(B) by striking `2007' and inserting `2009'.

(3) PROVISIONS NOT SUBJECT TO SUNSET- Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (relating to sunset provisions of such Act) shall not apply to section 303(a) of such Act.

(b) Increase in Credit Percentage for Families With 3 or More Children- The table contained in section 32(b)(1)(A) of such Code (relating to percentages) is amended--

(1) by striking `2 or more qualifying children' in the second row and inserting `2 qualifying children', and

(2) by inserting after the second row the following new item:
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
`3 or more qualifying children 45 21.06'.
------------------------------------------

(c) Reduction in Phaseout of Credit for Individuals With No Children- The table contained in section 32(b)(1)(A) of such Code is amended by striking `7.65' in the third column of the third row and inserting `3.82'.

(d) Permanent Extension of Special Rule Treating Combat Pay as Earned Income-

(1) IN GENERAL- Clause (vi) of section 32(c)(2)(B) of such Code (relating to earned income) is amended to read as follows:

`(iv) a taxpayer may elect to treat amounts excluded from gross income by reason of section 112 as earned income.'.

(2) PROVISION NOT SUBJECT TO SUNSET- Section 105 of the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 (relating to application of EGTRRA sunset to this title) shall not apply to section 104(b) of such Act.

(e) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. KG, what else came out on this.
This is a big tax decrease for the lower-income people. Was there a press release for this that I missed? (Good work, damn thenhits just keep on coming. This is wonderful stuff. It'll never get out of commitee, sigh!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sounds like a
preemptive strike against Bush's next announced agenda item - a TAX SYSTEM OVERHAUL. (look out!!!!!) Nice work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree. And the Earned Income Tax Credit
Is a great progressive tax idea. I bet the Rethugs are dying to get rid of it in favor of giving more tax cuts to the wealthy.

This is what I voted for Kerry to so. I just hope that Dems rally around it. It's great work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A Repug Senator
was talking about cutting Earned Income credit, I think it was Kyl. No way in hell are they going to get rid of those tax cuts for the rich, and I hope they pay for it in 2006, this should be a talking point for the Dems. The votes are there to prove it, on every admendment that asked to take part of the wealthiest tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is baseline Democrats stuff
If any Dem votes against this, they really aren't Dems. This is what we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here is the floor speech that introduced this measure
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=129353&keyword=&phrase=&contain=


Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, today I am introducing the Strengthen the Earned Income Tax Credit Act of 2005. Since 1975, the EITC has been an innovative tax credit which helps low-income working families. President Reagan referred to the EITC as ``the best antipoverty, the best pro-family, the best job creation measure to come out of Congress.' According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the EITC lifts more children out of poverty than any other government program.

It is time for us to reexamine the EITC and determine where we can strengthen it. Census data released in August and the events of Hurricane Katrina reiterated the fact that there is a group of Americans that are not benefiting from the economic recovery. The Census data shows the number of people who work, but live in poverty increased by 563,000. Four million more people were poor in 2004 than in 2001, when the economy hit bottom. The poverty rate in 2004 remains higher than the rate in 2001, the year of the recession.

Hurricane Katrina affected many individuals who were already faced with difficult economic situations. Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama are the first, second, and eighth poorest States in the Nation. The income of the typical household in these three States is well below the national average. In the hardest hit counties, 18.6 percent of the population is poor and the national average is 12.4 percent.

Time after time, the Republican controlled Congress has passed tax cuts which are skewed towards those with the most. The Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center reports that households with incomes of more than $1 million a year--the richest two-tenths of the population--receive tax cuts of an average of $103,000 a year. These individuals do not have to worry about how they will have to pay for a roof over their heads or enough gas to fill the tank. We should not be focused on tax cuts which help those who do not have to worry about living pay check to pay check.

We need to help the low-income workers who struggle day after day trying to make ends meet. They have been left behind in the economic policies of the last 4 years. We need to begin a discussion on how to help those that have been left behind. The Earned Income Tax Credit is the perfect place to start.

The Strengthen the Earned Income Tax Credit Act of 2005 strengthens the EITC by making the following four changes: Reduce marriage penalty; increase the credit for families with three or more children; slow down the phase-out for individuals with no children; and permanently extend the provision which allows members of the armed forces to include combat pay as income for EITC computations. By making these changes, more individuals and families would benefit from the EITC.

First, the legislation increases marriage penalty relief and makes it permanent. In the way that the EITC is currently structured, many single individuals that marry find themselves faced with a reduction in their EITC once they are married. The tax code should not penalize individuals who marry.

Second, the legislation increases the credit for families with three or more children. This proposal would make the credit more generous for families with 3 or more children. Increasing the credit rate results in an increase in the phase-out range. More families would be able to benefit from the EITC. The poverty level for an adult living with three children is $19,233. Under current law, an adult living with three children and eligible for the maximum EITC with income equivalent to the phase-out income level would still have income below the poverty level. This provision would lift this family above the poverty level. Some 36 percent of all children live in families with at least three children and more than half of poor children live in such families.

Third, the legislation would slow down the phase-out rate for individuals without children. It would result in more individuals without children eligible for the credit. For 2005, an individual with earnings above $11,750 would not be eligible for the EITC. Under the proposal, an individual with earnings above $16,950 would not be eligible for the EITC. The EITC for individuals with no children only offsets a portion of federal taxes. Giving more individuals the EITC would help provide an incentive to work.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC