So Mr. Drunken Sailor decides to go on the cheap for the war, by ending one part of it -- reconstruction money. I would like to know what JK's reaction to this is since in the past he has stated that reconstruction is one of the 4 things that need to be done in Iraq, or else we will not have success in Iraq. Here's the irony for me: I think we should be providing this money even AFTER we leave Iraq. But short sighted * is ending the one thing that showed good will toward the Iraqis. Just when you think things won't get worse for Iraq, it does.
Here's the info (hat tip: www.andrewsullivan.com):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200370.htmlBAGHDAD -- The Bush administration does not intend to seek any new funds for Iraq reconstruction in the budget request going before Congress in February, officials say. The decision signals the winding down of an $18.4 billion U.S. rebuilding effort in which roughly half of the money was eaten away by the insurgency, a buildup of Iraq's criminal justice system and the investigation and trial of Saddam Hussein.
Just under 20 percent of the reconstruction package remains unallocated. When the last of the $18.4 billion is spent, U.S. officials in Baghdad have made clear, other foreign donors and the fledgling Iraqi government will have to take up what authorities say is tens of billions of dollars of work yet to be done merely to bring reliable electricity, water and other services to Iraq's 26 million people.
"The U.S. never intended to completely rebuild Iraq," Brig. Gen. William McCoy, the Army Corps of Engineers commander overseeing the work, told reporters at a recent news conference. In an interview this past week, McCoy said: "This was just supposed to be a jump-start."
snip
At the same time, the hundreds of Americans and Iraqis who have devoted themselves to the reconstruction effort point to 3,600 projects that the United States has completed or intends to finish before the $18.4 billion runs out around the end of 2006. These include work on 900 schools, construction of hospitals and nearly 160 health care centers and clinics, and repairs on or construction of nearly 800 miles of highways, city streets and village roads.
But the insurgency has set back efforts across the board. In two of the most crucial areas, electricity and oil production, relentless sabotage has kept output at or below prewar levels despite the expenditure of hundreds of millions of American dollars and countless man-hours. Oil production stands at roughly 2 million barrels a day, compared with 2.6 million before U.S. troops entered Iraq in March 2003, according to U.S. government statistics.
The national electrical grid has an average daily output of 4,000 megawatts, about 400 megawatts less than its prewar level.
Iraqis nationwide receive on average less than 12 hours of power a day. For residents of Baghdad, it was six hours a day last month, according to a U.S. count, though many residents say that figure is high.
The Americans, said Zaid Saleem, 26, who works at a market in Baghdad, "are the best in destroying things but they are the worst in rebuilding."
On the parts I bolded:
Actually, I kind of got the impression that either we or proceeds from the oil were going to completely rebuild Iraq.
Notice how the infrastructure was actually in better shape under Saddam Hussein AND sanctions. I mean, if those lights were on all the time, maybe the war would end. I'm really serious.
I am sad to agree with the young Iraqi, although not about all Americans, but about the * administration -- they only know how to destroy, not build.
Finally, I think New Orleans should take note of what is happening in Iraq, and realize they're going to have to scream and yell and even hire lobbyists to keep reconstruction going there. And they don't even have an insurgency.