Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Teresa may be interested in this case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:05 PM
Original message
I think Teresa may be interested in this case
This was posted in another forum. The woman may need friends on this - if not Mama T, maybe other concerned folks can step up.


February 1, 2006

Voting Systems Lawsuit Reaches U.S. Supreme Court
by Lynn Landes


Landes is representing herself in this action.

"I tried to get civil rights organizations interested in this case, but had no luck. Their disregard for this issue is incredible. It's clear to me that without direct access to a physical ballot and meaningful transparency in the process, our elections have no integrity whatsoever," says Landes.

The defendants in the Landes lawsuit are Margaret Tartaglione, Chair of the City Commissioners of Philadelphia; Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States.

Attorneys for the defendants have successfully fought Landes, claiming that she did not prove an injury and therefore does not have standing. Landes counters that she has the right to challenge the constitutionality of acts of the legislative branch under federal statute and case law, most
significantly under Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

Early American history seems to favor the Landes position. Prior to the Civil War, voting was a public and transparent process. It was only after
the war, as the elective franchise expanded to minorities and women, three changes to state and federal election laws were adopted that eventually made the voting process a private and ontransparent enterprise: absentee voting was allowed (1870's), the Australian secret ballot method was adopted
(1880's), and voting machines were permitted by Congress (1899).

Today, 94.6% of all votes are processed by machines and approximately 30% of all voting is conducted early or by absentee.

The defendants' response is due at the Supreme Court no later than February 24, 2006. The Landes lawsuit can be found at the following url:
www.EcoTalk.org/lawsuit.doc
Docket no: http://search.access.gpo.gov/supreme-court/searchright....

Source:

EcoTalk.org
Lynn Landes, publisher
215-629-3553
lynnlandes@earthlink.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh sheet! It's going to the Supreme Court - oh well!
We have a huge election battle going on in AZ.
Funny thing, and luckily, it is between two repugs.
During the primaries. They found boxes of ballots
in a storeroom in the airport! The recount has now
changed the outcome, 1 1/2 yr later...don't know yet
what will happen. FBI is now involved looking into possible
ballot tampering or possible computer fraud!

One day the truth will come out.

More and more stories like these will surface.
BUT - having the Supremes that we have now, really concerns me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC