WARNING about photo contests...

[regnaD kciN]

No, not the ones here. But this article points out two eye-opening examples (from the Sierra Club and Costco, two well-known "progressive" organizations, no less) of contests whose terms are so outrageously slanted against photographers as to constitute a form of fine-print trickery. How bad? Well, how about a clause where entering the contest constitutes transferring all ownership rights to the image to the company running the contest? Or one where not only is the organization granted a free license to use your photo, and even assign that license to anyone else it wants, but where you, the photographer, agree to pay all legal expenses if, for whatever reason, the organization gets sued by anyone else on account of your photo? (Note that, in each case, you have to give up those rights just for entering the contest, whether or not your entry goes on to win anything.)

Just a reminder: when entering a photo contest, read the fine print very carefully. Lots of contests contain terms that are pretty much a free "rights-grab" which could leave the photographer with having lost control of his or her image for nothing in return. When in doubt, don't enter!

[NashVegas]

1. Internet + Intellectual Property Rights + Corps = A New Era of Mining Claims

It's crazy ass shit. It was nutty enough when companies and individuals were claiming rights to resources that nature provided; now they're trying to claim rights to the creative work of individuals. One of the biggest reasons I'm leery of most social-networking sites.

US Copyright Register Marybeth Peters told Intellectual Property Watch that orphan works legislation is expected to be introduced within the next 10 days. It is her understanding there may still be some issues in the House version to be resolved, and there are some stakeholders - such as illustrators and other artists - "who are probably going to lobby pretty hard against it."

Peters said this issue is important to her, and the fact it came so close to passing last year is almost bittersweet. "What I hope it isn't ... is it's one magic moment you get" to finally get it passed, then it doesn't happen, she said.

We don't mean to disparage the Register's comments. She's had a long and distinguished career at the Copyright Office. But her statement deserves a reality check.Illustrators are not opposed to an orphan works bill. We're opposed to this bill.

We're opposed because its scope far exceeds the needs of responsible orphan works legislation.

Moreover, illustrators and artists are not the only stakeholders who oppose it. At last count, more than 83 creators organizations are on record against it, representing artists, photographers, writers, songwriters, musicians and countless small businesses.

Last year, we proposed amendments to the Orphan Works Act that would have made it a true orphan works bill. The amendments were drafted by the attorney who was chief legal counsel to the House Judiciary Committee in drafting the 1976 Copyright Act. The amendments were co-sponsored by the Artists Rights Society and the Advertising Photographers of America. They can be found here: http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com/2008/07/hr-5889-amendments.html

On July 11, 2008, we submitted those amendments to both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. In our preamble we wrote this:

As rights holders, we can summarize our hopes for the Orphan Works Act simply: to see that it becomes a true orphan works bill, with no unnecessary spillover effect to damage the everyday commercial activities of working artists. We'd be happy to work with Congress to accomplish this. No legislation regarding the use of private property should be considered without the active participation of those whose property is at stake.

Last year more than 180,000 letters were sent to lawmakers from our Capwiz site. These letters did not come from obstructionists. They came from citizens whose property is at stake. They may lack the resources of big Internet companies and the access of high powered lobbyists, but last year they spoke. They asked only one thing: that Congress respect their personal property rights and amend this bill to make it nothing more than what its sponsors say they want it to be - a bill that would affect only true orphaned work.

We urge this Congress to listen.


http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977718322

[Tindalos]

2. Seems like we're losing ownership of everything

It feels like they're taking everything away from us. Property, money, resources, art, etc. Pretty soon nobody's going to own anything anymore.

[WannaJumpMyScooter]

3. oh, some will own plenty

don't you worry about them

[Tindalos]

4. I'm not worried about "them"

I worry about "us".