Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stacking the moon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 10:22 PM
Original message
Stacking the moon
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 11:19 PM by qnr
In alfredo's "I'm starting to figure out how to photograph the moon." thread, I was talking with him about how to stack photos. I decided to take some shots tonight and stack them, to give an idea of the results for those that have never tried to use stacking before.
Moon straight out of the camera
This is (one of) the original shots. Taken using the 400mm prime (800mm film equiv). Not too bad by itself, but stacking can improve it. I deliberately shot it at a higher ISO to show how the noise can be cleaned up.
Details: Aperture Priority, 1/800 second, F/11, ISO 1600

Moon-stacked with "normal mode"
This is an example of a number of individual frames stacked in the gimp using "normal" mode. What this does is increase resolution and reduce noise. Resolution is increased because fluctuations in the atmosphere show and hide details in the individual photos. In a similar manner, noise is reduced, because the noise is random, and doesn't get "reinforced" from image to image.

Moon-stacked with two modes simultaneously
This photo uses the exact same photos in the stack that were used in the previous photo. However, in this case, I'm using a combination of "multiply" mode and "addition" mode (Edit: Note that I mean on individual layers, each layer can only be one mode). Multiply increases contrast. Addition lightens the image without increasing noise. Normally, you'd use one or the other, but since I was using the same number of photos/layers for both images, if I'd stuck to just multiply, the image would have gotten too dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can't edit the post anymore - so here's a screenshot of the gimp layers & opacity levels used
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 11:36 PM by qnr
Edit: Note that the 14 layers is just a random thing, a group I decided to grab. I just used sequential (continuous) mode and blasted a pile of shots at once. You can technically stack with even 2 photos (and even copying each of those into another layer can help) -- however, the more photos you use (especially for addition mode, trying to bring up dim stars, for example) the better the quality will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. very slick
bz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks - it's interesting what it can do. I once experimented with a totally dark
room, with the idiot light from a battery charger being the only source of light. Using additive stacking, I was able to read the titles of books on the bookshelf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. I've copied and saved the instructions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Arts & Entertainment » Photography Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC