Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something's fishy about the Limbaugh arrest story...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:56 PM
Original message
Something's fishy about the Limbaugh arrest story...
I'm not talking about the preferential treatment.

Any chance his lawyer is making sh!t up?

1) An arrest warrant is issued.
2) Turns himself in.
3) Posts bail.
4) Lawyer says he hasn't been charged, yet he was arrested?
5) Lawyer says he pled "not guilty," yet he hasn't been arraigned?
6) He's reimbursing the state for investigation expenses?
7) Has there even been an official statement by anyone other than his lawyer?

Any chance of someone telling the DA "You can't make this kind of agreement. Either bring it to trial or drop the charges immediately." What the hell is the point of investigating, arresting, then telling them "Okay, be good now!"

If this was probation, he'd be drug tested. Notice there's no mention of any testing to be done.

The fact is, he commited prescription fraud. His addiction shouldn't be a way out unless ALL drug addicts are given the same leeway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something is fishy. How can he be arrested, pleads innocent, & get plea

bargain. In other words he committed a felony, gets a slap on the writs, & it doesn't get on his record because he pleads not-guilty?!? Sounds like the 'no wrong doing' crap the corporations are always pulling. Oh, millions of dollars are pilfered by our exec. but not one did anything wrong. Or
we just polluted a river, made a deal with the gov't, & nothing wrong happened.

Sounds like complete story isn't in yet or this is the ultimate whitewash.

So when it comes to Rush or Jeb Crows daughter - GOP is soft on crime, but for dems & minorities it's lock em up forever. Except - rich dems get away with stuff too - i.e Kennedy.

Note the timing of the press release - Friday evening - is that by accident?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grunion Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. ''Note the timing of the press release - Friday evening...''
Would the news change if it were Monday or Tuesday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like he's spent just enough time before a judge
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:05 PM by Kagemusha
This is one hell of a confusing thing, but it sounds like

a) turns self in
b) arrested at the PD
c) Brought before a judge
d) Charged with 1 count (per plea agreement)
e) Pleads not guilty (not in violation of plea agreement, DA doesn't give a damn)
f) Bail is arranged
g) Limbaugh leaves courthouse

and then the lawyer gives out a press release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But how did he plead "not guilty?"
He wasn't arraigned, or at least that hasn't been mentioned.

Did he just write "Not guilty" on a Post-It Note and stick it on his bail bond?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Self-deleted
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:04 PM by Kagemusha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Did he stop by Denney's on the way home? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. procecutor and Rush lawyer reached a deal. that is all i can figure out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. cnn. Single charge of dr. shopping. out on bond. NOT quilty he claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Winner is Rush L. cut a sweet deal--no criminal record, NOTHING if stays
good boy for 18 months. Done done done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The past victory in courts (DA could use his med. records)--and this is al
l that happens. sweet deal for Rush L.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11.  a few days of embarrassment. then all is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And on a weekend, no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There's still the arrest record.
And even if they scrub that, at least we still have our copies to keep. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. small morsals. no misnomeaner, no felony, no record. SWEET DEAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. I don't think any of us will forget this one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Florida "Soft on [Republican] Drug Crimes."
First Noelle Bush (Jeb's daughter), now this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is called "Pretrial intervention"
Below is the Florida law. LOL enjoy. (info from a Florida State site)

948.08 Pretrial intervention program.--

(1) The department shall supervise pretrial intervention programs for persons charged with a crime, before or after any information has been filed or an indictment has been returned in the circuit court. Such programs shall provide appropriate counseling, education, supervision, and medical and psychological treatment as available and when appropriate for the persons released to such programs.

(2) Any first offender, or any person previously convicted of not more than one nonviolent misdemeanor, who is charged with any misdemeanor or felony of the third degree is eligible for release to the pretrial intervention program on the approval of the administrator of the program and the consent of the victim, the state attorney, and the judge who presided at the initial appearance hearing of the offender. However, the defendant may not be released to the pretrial intervention program unless, after consultation with his or her attorney, he or she has voluntarily agreed to such program and has knowingly and intelligently waived his or her right to a speedy trial for the period of his or her diversion. The defendant or the defendant's immediate family may not personally contact the victim or the victim's immediate family to acquire the victim's consent under this section.

(3) The criminal charges against an offender admitted to the program shall be continued without final disposition for a period of 90 days after the date the offender was released to the program, if the offender's participation in the program is satisfactory, and for an additional 90 days upon the request of the program administrator and consent of the state attorney, if the offender's participation in the program is satisfactory.

(4) Resumption of pending criminal proceedings shall be undertaken at any time if the program administrator or state attorney finds that the offender is not fulfilling his or her obligations under this plan or if the public interest so requires. The court may not appoint the public defender to represent an indigent offender released to the pretrial intervention program unless the offender's release is revoked and the offender is subject to imprisonment if convicted.

(5) At the end of the intervention period, the administrator shall recommend:

(a) That the case revert to normal channels for prosecution in instances in which the offender's participation in the program has been unsatisfactory;

(b) That the offender is in need of further supervision; or

(c) That dismissal of charges without prejudice shall be entered in instances in which prosecution is not deemed necessary.

The state attorney shall make the final determination as to whether the prosecution shall continue.

(6)(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, a person who is charged with a felony of the second or third degree for purchase or possession of a controlled substance under chapter 893, and who has not previously been convicted of a felony nor been admitted to a pretrial program referred to in this section, is eligible for admission into a pretrial substance abuse education and treatment intervention program approved by the chief judge of the circuit, for a period of not less than 1 year in duration, upon motion of either party or the court's own motion, except:

1. If a defendant was previously offered admission to a pretrial substance abuse education and treatment intervention program at any time prior to trial and the defendant rejected that offer on the record, then the court or the state attorney may deny the defendant's admission to such a program.

2. If the state attorney believes that the facts and circumstances of the case suggest the defendant's involvement in the dealing and selling of controlled substances, the court shall hold a preadmission hearing. If the state attorney establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence at such hearing, that the defendant was involved in the dealing or selling of controlled substances, the court shall deny the defendant's admission into a pretrial intervention program.

(b) At the end of the pretrial intervention period, the court shall consider the recommendation of the administrator pursuant to subsection (5) and the recommendation of the state attorney as to disposition of the pending charges. The court shall determine, by written finding, whether the defendant has successfully completed the pretrial intervention program.

(c)1. If the court finds that the defendant has not successfully completed the pretrial intervention program, the court may order the person to continue in education and treatment or order that the charges revert to normal channels for prosecution.

2. The court shall dismiss the charges upon a finding that the defendant has successfully completed the pretrial intervention program.

(d) Any entity, whether public or private, providing a pretrial substance abuse education and treatment intervention program under this subsection must contract with the county or appropriate governmental entity, and the terms of the contract must include, but need not be limited to, the requirements established for private entities under s. 948.15(3).

(7) The chief judge in each circuit may appoint an advisory committee for the pretrial intervention program composed of the chief judge or his or her designee, who shall serve as chair; the state attorney, the public defender, and the program administrator, or their designees; and such other persons as the chair deems appropriate. The committee may also include persons representing any other agencies to which persons released to the pretrial intervention program may be referred.

(8) The department may contract for the services and facilities necessary to operate pretrial intervention programs.

History.--s. 6, ch. 74-112; s. 1, ch. 75-301; s. 24, ch. 77-120; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 36, ch. 79-3; s. 1, ch. 80-329; s. 9, ch. 91-225; s. 6, ch. 91-280; s. 1, ch. 93-229; ss. 1688, 1689, ch. 97-102; s. 13, ch. 97-107; s. 123, ch. 99-3; s. 1, ch. 99-152.
Note.--Former s. 944.025.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yep...it's a 3rd degree felony.
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:07 PM by Rufus T. Firefly
Boo.

FSS 893.13(7a9) PRESCRIPTION FRAUD - It is unlawful to acquire or obtain or attempt to acquire or obtain possession of a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, subterfuge, or deception (3rd Deg. Fel).x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. So now he's OFFICIALLY a fraud! Before it was just general knowledge.
Let's see him thrash the prosecutor while he's on probation ~

Noelle Bush was charged with something similar. Forging prescriptions or something. These Republicans, so tough on other people's petty crimes, so unwilling to take responsibility for their own!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Guess here in Florida if you're politcally (Repub.) connected- you get off
Noelle Bush also got off pretty much scott free here in Florida also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Probably pleaded "nolo contendre"
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:22 PM by Maddy McCall
No contest.

That's the only way he could get a deal or be a candidate for the adjudication process, without pleading guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. He's paying $30,000 in court costs....
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:10 PM by NightOwwl
probably paid his lawyer over $100,000.

Just goes to show, money CAN buy everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fiveleafclover Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. It hasn't bought him a wife who wouldn't leave him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. There isn't enough money in the world.
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think his lawyer is spinning so fast
He can't be seen by the naked eye anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Damn! Where's the mug shot!?!
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 06:16 PM by calipendence
Or at least a decent "frog march" shot! Needs to be on smoking gun soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. LOL! You and I will be racing to TSG to get the photo and post it at DU.
:hi: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Looks like it's here now...
Typical "Delay Style" shot...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. ROTFL
Hope he wipes that grin off his face as fast as Delay.:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Look at the charges.
We now have proof that RUSH WAS ARRESTED FOR FRAUD.

I don't care what anyone says--sure he has received and will get preferential treatment.

For Democrats, though, this is nothing but beautiful. The fun we can have with this!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Check it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. It was a cop-out by the prosecutors. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wolfie coming up with ...'clarification'?? in a few
no idea what that means
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The Sherrif said he was arrested
according to Wolfie. His lawyer is lying - spin, spin spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's called buying justice
Rich folks do it all the time.

If you have money, you can buy your way out of almost anything.

Now poor drug addicts just have to do the time and screw rehab.


"Mr. Limbaugh and I have maintained from the start that there was no doctor shopping, and we continue to hold this position," Black said in an e-mailed statement.

(snip)

Prosecutors seized Limbaugh's records after learning that he received about 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors in six months, at a pharmacy near his Palm Beach mansion. They contended that Limbaugh engaged in "doctor shopping," or illegally deceived multiple doctors to receive overlapping prescriptions.

Limbaugh acknowledged he became addicted to pain medication, blaming it on severe back pain.

According to Black, Limbaugh also has agreed to make a $30,000 payment to the state to defray the public cost of the investigation. The agreement also provides that he must refrain from violating the law during this 18 months, must pay $30 per month for the cost of supervision and comply with other similar provisions of the agreement.

http://www.courttv.com/people/2006/0428/limbaugh_ap.html#continue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC