|
Sure there are thousands of scandals, but what will the average Archie Bunker think about all of them?
Rush Limbaugh, pleads not guilty, and in 18 months it all goes away once and for all. Gee, what are the chances that this will maintain traction? I would be willing to bet that Rush is sitting back right now, reading this site, laughing with his rich and powerful friends, pointing at our distress, and lighting a cigar with a $100 bill, just to show what $30,000 means to him.
DeLay, wanna bet it fades away pretty much the same?
We scream look at the crooks, and the average citizen, who has the attention span of a gnat, watches the problem fade away, not guilty, out on technicality, and figures we are screaming wolf, or the sky is falling or whatever.
Then there is the response of our elected officials. When the Domestic Wiretapping came out, not one Elected Democrat demanded that Bush shut the damned thing down. Not one, what did we do? We demanded the chance to make the program legal, so Bush could keep doing it. That is apparently the Beltway Opposition plan, to enable Bush, while talking up how wrong it is. Don't actually DO anything, just talk about it.
How do you think the average dolt responds when these scandals break? Most ho hum them, ignoring it, because the flood of them have managed to desensitize the populace. Now, when it finally shakes out, Rush is Not Guilty, DeLay is out but do you think that makes him more or less dangerous? Now he will set up some Swift Boat site for the Repugnik Red Meat brigades, putting fresh blood into the Right Wing Conspiracy.
The Right Wing Conspiracy, less than two hours after news of the CIA Agent being fired was released, all the Repugnik Right Wing loons had her total resume, links to every news item, and a huge conspiratorial scenario which had her husband supporting/paying Joe Wilson. Less than 120 minutes to completely research read, compile, and prepare the report, and then publish it on the web? I don't think so, no one is that fast, no one. Even a speed reader would take time to compile, toss out duplicates, and then to "connect the dots" on everyone involved?
We are doomed, we will lose in November, because we aren't doing our jobs, as Democrats. We aren't telling the people that by Voting Democrat they will be pushing the envelope on individual liberty, freedom, and corporate responsibility. What do we promise? A smarter war on terror, great, smarter smart bombs. How smart does the bomb that slaughters the innocents need to be? We will lose in 2008, they are pushing Hillary on us with all their might, knowing they will have nearly 20 years of dirt sitting in filing cabinets all over Washington. Unlike us, they drop the scandals slowly, a drop at a time, instead of a flood, one after another, each one calculated. As soon as we get a hint of a scandal, we stop looking, and run to the Press with the assumption that this one, this one will be the one that turns the tide. We rush to the Press like a teenager with his first premature ejaculation acting like we have finally found the key to the orgasm. That is the impression that most people have, and here is the bad part, they are upset with Bush, but are upset with him for different reasons.
They don't want him out, they want him to slap the crap out of the scandal mongers, and the "Left Wing Media" (I know, they are so full of shit but this is what they think) and all they get from us is "Bush is a crook".
If Bush listens to Rove, and we can hope he won't, he will deploy the National Guard to the Boarder, to catch and return the Undocumented Workers to Mexico, at machine gun point of course, to toss the red meat to the rabid bigots before the election.
|