you have a jerk on springer who says he was law clerk of alito

[still_one]

BULL

This is a repuke setup, telling springer what an honorable person he is

and that he will only judge cases based on law

[ncrainbowgrrl]

1. do they say where the clerk is from? (n/t)

[still_one]

3. no he didn't

springer did all right handling the guy, but the caller was too smooth, especially the accolades he was painting alito with

[hlthe2b]

2. Springer's naivete' and gullibility pose a limitless opportunity

for the RW to pull their BS. I wish Springer would either wise up... or get a more hardened producer to help him out.

[still_one]

4. he actually handled the caller O.K.

and other callers pointed out the paper trail and decisions that alito has made which do NOT represent a main stream person

[NYCGirl]

5. He handled it well. What do you want him to say?

The caller may have been legit (the screeners there are pretty good).

[still_one]

8. maybe, but he sure talked the kool aide talk

[NYCGirl]

9. I think the guy was sincere.

Doesn't mean we have to give Alito a pass.

[still_one]

11. we are not in disagreement

I also think the PNACers are sincere, and they will lie and cheat to reach their objective

[NYCGirl]

12. No, I meant he was not lying. But his experience is not necessarily

germane to the confirmation hearings.

[still_one]

13. I agree

[Gothmog]

6. I was a debate where Alito former law clerk defended him

I was a delegate to the Union of Reform Judasim National Biennial in November where there was a debate on Alito. One of Alito's law clerk defended him very well. Despite such defense, the URJ voted to oppose Alito's confirmation.

[in_cog_ni_to]

7. MY question: Why would Springer allow him on his show?

I wonder how many LIBERALS Rush Limballs has on his show? Liberals need to learn how to play ball with the big boys. NEVER let a repuke on yer freakin' show!:grr:

[NYCGirl]

10. What's the problem? Springer isn't Limbaugh. I think that's a good thing.

:shrug: