Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA & Continuity Of Governemnt(COG)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 05:33 PM
Original message
FEMA & Continuity Of Governemnt(COG)
93% of the FEMA budget was spent on non emergency activities. They WERE resonsible to COG in time of nuclear attack, they built the city under MT Weather where Cheney goes. Has this 93% all been absorbed into DHS? FEMA is on the chopping block
quote......
What came out of the critical look was that FEMA was spending 12 times more for "black operations" than for disaster relief. It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress , only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979.

FEMA has developed 300 sophisticated mobile units that are capable of sustaining themselves for a month. The vehicles are located in five areas of the United States. They have tremendous communication systems and each contains a generator that would provide power to 120 homes each, but have never been used for disaster relief.

end quote......
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/gvcon6.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had the technology to save many of the people in
the Gulf Coast and they deliberately chose not to employ it...this is absolutely criminal!!


<snip>
The vehicles are located in five areas of the United States. They have tremendous communication systems and each contains a generator that would provide power to 120 homes each, but have never been used for disaster relief.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sorry, did that answer my question???
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry....I was outraged by the fact that they misused the money...
Has this 93% all been absorbed into DHS? FEMA is on the chopping block


To answer your question....I remember awhile back that there were stories that the * administration really didn't think Fema was important so they merged it into DHS and basically started starving the organization of funds....the administrations wanted to get rid of the organization...but seeing as they totally f** up the Katrina event...it is obvious there needs to be an organizaton that is geared towards disaster preparednes...

in my opinion I think each state is on it's own....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC