Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lynchings ALIVE and happening NOW in South Carolina ! ! !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
QuettaKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:13 AM
Original message
Lynchings ALIVE and happening NOW in South Carolina ! ! !
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 10:38 AM by QuettaKid
un-be-lievable.

""Five white teenagers have been sentenced to prison after pleading guilty Tuesday to second-degree lynching in an attack on a black teenager last summer. Christopher Scott Cates will serve six years in prison after pleading guilty to lynching and assault, said Murray Glenn, a spokesman for the Cherokee County prosecutor's officeJason Grice, Justin Ashley Phillips and Kenneth Eugene Miller Jr. will have to spend three years in prison each, and Jerry Christopher Toney will have to spend 30 months in prison, Glenn said.""

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/13597236.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. the Feds say they determined it wasn't a hate crime?
And if the black kid was lynched, and not just beaten, why in the world were the perps given basically a slap on the wrist? The article doesn't say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No hate crime laws on the books in that state
I saw the story on one of the news channels the other day. IIRC, they said that South Carolina is one of two states with no hate crime laws, so the most they could charge the scum with was lynching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. By lynching do they mean
they killed the black fellow by hanging? The fact that they weren't tried for murder is what is throwing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The story says they beat him up, not killed him. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thank you.
I read that part, too, but if memory serves, historically a lynching starts with a beating and then ends with a hanging. That's what threw me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I thought it started with a pubic hair on a Coke can...
I thought it started with a pubic hair on a Coke can and
ended up with you being confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Or maybe that's just the "high tech" style of "lynching".

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I do not believe that the victim was killed
If the story that I heard about is this same story, the victim did not die. The report also said that the state defined lynching as two or more people against one in a fight. This is just what I remember hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Odd definition of lynching
in doing historical research, lynching usually refers only to hanging someone, though a beating could be something that happened before the hanging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree
I thought the same thing when I heard the story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. early origins of the term
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 11:47 AM by slaveplanet
tend to indicate that it was punishment reserved for Tory or loyalist judges, or loyalist commisioners and agents. It was very effective in persuading those in positions of power to get with the new program.
The punishment often include tar and feathers




so effective , it was then used for frontier justice where law enforcement was non existent.


It does not seem to have morphed into a widespread tool of terror until reconstruction. In this morphed form,law enforcement was often in cahoots with the mobs and the events were highly planned for maximum effect.

What goes on nowadays is plain old vigilantism or straight up assualt,
and it happens black on white, just as much as it does white on black

2 weeks ago in N Carolina there was a case of 2 blacks who chained their white victim to his pickup truck that they just carjacked...and dragged him, he survived but no hate crime was charged.
I suppose this would also qualify as a Lynching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebaby3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Actually, I got me degree in history at an HBCU and a lynching in not
defined only as a hanging. You can have a lynching without a hanging. A lynching has other aspects such as beating, mutilation of a corpse, humiliation, etc. and is not just a black/white issue. Most of the cases of lynchings have been white on black crime, but there were also many Jewish people lynched as well. Although the victim is usually killed during the process, technically you could have a lynching without death, but legally I would think it would be considered a lynching with attempted murder.

A really great, yet disturbing, project about lynching is called "Without Sanctuary." If you can handle it, I would highly recommend viewing. I will warn you, it is graphic and will tear you up emotionally. You will see photos of lynchings where there was no hanging.

For anyone who has not seen this:

<http://www.withoutsanctuary.org/main.html>

Again, this is GRAPHIC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Here's a link with the whole story....
http://www.courttv.com/trials/grice/background_ctv.html

It was a severe beating but the black youth lived (no hanging involved). Apparently the definition of lynching varies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Thanks for the link
when I was doing historical research, lynching inevitably was defined as an illegal hanging by a mob, often including beatings and torture. I'm glad I can now read the entire story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Lynching is their legal term for a gang attack
It does confuse some outside of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. This was in North Carolina.
Which is far, far, far more advanced in race relations than South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thanks, I stand corrected, I thought it was South Carolina n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Actually, you're correct.
The newspaper is in North Carolina, but the story's out of South Carolina.

Still - NC is more progressive than SC by a long shot.

However, they pleaded to second-degree lynching, which is more than I would have expected in SC. I lived there for three months and it was AWFUL (and I'm white!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catbird Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. NC vs. SC
The Charlotte (NC) Observer is sometimes referred to as the best newspaper in South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Lynching means any mob attack according to the law there
The only reason this even made the papers is because of a slippage in the meaning of "lynching." In this case, "lynching" means a group attack on an individual. According to this definition, I myself have been been "lynched" about five times growing up in New York City, and - quite frankly - I also did a bit of lynching myself! The term has a general cultural currency, but it is completely different from the specific legal meaning in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. YOUR HEADLINE IS WRONG!
This was in gafnee SC. Home of the giant peach that looks like a vagina.

Cherokee County, S.C.

5 teens sentenced in lynching of 16-year-old last summer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Lynching there means assault by a mob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. No shit. They call it coon hunting.
I lived there for awhile. And don't kid yourself, it happens in mid florida, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Terrible but not the same as before. In days gone by, the
perpetrators NEVER were punished. However, the sentences are ridiculously too lenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. THAT'S all they got? meanwhile selling weed gets you 55yrs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. What we're really talking about here is aggravated assault.
The sentences don't appear unduly lenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC