Read this rant on another right-winger's LiveJournal:
1) "New Age Religion of the Month Club": Haven't you noticed that, while Heaven forbid anyone mention Christ or the Ten Commandments, you can easily find High School courses that go into reincarnation, thought transference, meditation, astral travel, Worship of Mother Earth, and so forth? These are religious practices ripped from their religious contexts and mangled by the hippie-dippy sensibilities of the kind of nitwit that goes to a Teachers' College these days. Hence New Age Religion of the Month Club.
2) Unduly? I'm not sure I'd agree with that. As I've suggested before, Christian culture, for all its flaws, seems to come out ahead of the competition. It is certainly head and shoulders above the religion of the ACLU (Marxism), which inspired the murder of a hundred million people in a single century. If Bush is to have a guiding set of principles (and I for one think that a President had better), he could do an awful lot worse. He could, for instance, be guided by the racist elitist progressivism of Woodrow Wilson - which got us into WWI for no very good reason, and then bungled the peace accords so badly as the virtually assure WWII.
3) I really think that if anybody bothered to investigate it in detail they would find that opposition to Gay Marriage has far more to do with
a) Opposition to being pushed around by Judges who are exceeding their lawful authority.
and
b) A visceral reaction to the Gay community's deliberate campaign to present Gays and careless hedonists. When one reads about "Bug Chasers" (and Gods, I hope that that reporter was having his leg pulled) one tends to conclude that the subculture that tolerates them isn't ready for any real responsibility. Ditto the fight to keep the Bath House culture going despite the AIDS epidemic, and so on.
Face it, for the last decade or two the public face of the Gay community has been a bunch of heedless twits. If Gays want to be treated like responsible adults (and being allowed to marry would be a big step in that direction) they are going to have to change that. Is this fair? Maybe not, but it is how society works.
4) I now a large number of self -professed Christians. They are not agaisnt condoms. They are against
a) Giving condoms to grade school children for the same very good reasons that they are against handing out powerful firecrackers to the same kids.
b) The determination of Ed School dregs who apparently cannot teach children how to read, write, or do basic math to take over something as nuanced as teaching sexual responsibility. This attitude is not helped by the pattern of headstrong teachers who take it on themselves to circumvent whatever restrictions are placed on them by local parents.
c) Treating condoms as a solution. Condoms do not stop transmission of STDs, because they do not prevent the passage of viruses (they make it harder, but don't stop it). A lot of the Christian Backlash that Ed Sex advocates prattle about is little more than thinking people who have discovered (by reading) that the Sexual Revolution was attended by a several hundred percent jump in the rate of STDs, and that the Gay population (BEFORE AIDS!) had an STD rate six or seven times higher than the background population. Proponents of Progressive Education seem to believe that the rise in teen pregnancy that happened in the twentieth century in spite of more affective and more available birth control has nothing to do with sex education in the schools. Large numbers of parents disagree, and the responsibility ultimately devolves onto the parents.
BTW I strongly suspect that abstinance programs in public schools 'fail' because the people who teach them WANT them to fail, just as phonics programs do not have the same degree of god results in Public Schools that they have at home because Public School teachers undermine them.
http://rhjunior.livejournal.com/275463.htmlhttp://neyland-tarr.livejournal.com/