Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Idaho ponders having prisoners sleep in shifts"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:29 PM
Original message
"Idaho ponders having prisoners sleep in shifts"
BOISE, Idaho (Reuters) - With space scarce as the U.S. prison population grows, a top Idaho lawmaker is proposing that inmates share beds by sleeping in shifts, a practice sometimes used by the U.S. military.

"Why does every inmate need his or her own bed?" asked State Sen. Robert Geddes. "The military does it all the time."

The issue arises as Idaho and other states stiffen penalties for drug-related crimes, putting a premium on prison space. Idaho has nearly 7,000 inmates, and that number is growing by nearly 7 percent a year.

http://reuters.iwon.com/article/20060111/2006-01-11T143609Z_01_EIC152580_RTRIDST_0_ODD-PRISONS-BEDS-DC.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree... shifts are more comfortable for sleeping. They don't bind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Heheh.. I think they meant hotbunking *lol*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Hotbunking --
that just sounds so...so unRepublican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. shifts
Mumu's are even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That idea is just Zippy.
> Mumu's are even better.

That idea is just Zippy.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Nekkid. Drawbacks....if the house catches fire at 3am...toasty buns. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, it's not like there's any room left in Idaho to build anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's how my family did it.
Not enough beds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Release all the marijuana offenders...
and you'd have plenty of room for the real criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. AAAaaa-men, brother ben, Amen!!! War on Terror is the new War on Drugs
Neither can be won. Both create multiple levels of bureaucracy and generate hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Amen!
The growing prison population, and the stiffer penalties for non-violent, recreational drug offenders, should be a signal that we are putting too many people in prison for things that are unnecessary. It's a terrible drain on society, because not only do we have to spend tax dollars to keep them in prison, in most cases it shifts the cost of supporting their families onto society, as well.

If a single mom is convicted, who takes care of her kids? Chances are, it's a grandparent, who might not be financially able, or they are put into the foster system, which is another nightmare. Our drug laws are draconian, and completely irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. End the War of Drugs.
Start early release on non-violent offenders. Get the treatment so they can get back into society and be productive members again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Shocking as it may seem, there are drug users who don't need
treatment.

Coerced drug treatment should be limited to those people who have proven their drug use is problematic, by getting caught driving while wrecked, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If you listen to Liberal Radio...
you daily listen to several users of marijuana who need no treatment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, Idaho, but you're gonna have to pay up
if you want to throw so many people in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC