Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abramoff: ten months, TWO HUNDRED WH visits! that's EVERY DAY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:15 PM
Original message
Abramoff: ten months, TWO HUNDRED WH visits! that's EVERY DAY
Edited on Tue May-02-06 07:39 PM by Gabi Hayes
of a five day work week for ten months

every business day, as Olbermann and the reporter breaking the story say

EVERY DAY!

reporter: in the new days of accelerated WH access, this is "White House excess"

two hundred visits...how are they going to spin that?

every single work day

EDIT: here's a story on this

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14478714.htm

WASHINGTON - A federal judge has ordered the Secret Service to release all records of disgraced GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff's visits to the White House - which could prove an embarrassment for President Bush.

The logs are expected to show who Abramoff met with at the White House as well as when and how long he was there.

Bush has said he didn't know Abramoff, who pleaded guilty in a massive influence-peddling scandal. But photos show the two posing for pictures at the White House. Abramoff also raised more than $100,000 for Bush's 2004 reelection campaign.

.............

no mention of the 200 visits that I can find online so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder where his desk was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. next to Gannon? or maybe
at the Watergate Annex, with Goss and Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. I seem to recall Gannon visits numbered over 200 as well. But maybe that
was over a longer time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. si! but how funny would it be if there was a Gannon/Abramoff/etal
Edited on Tue May-02-06 07:33 PM by Gabi Hayes
connection

lord knows the possibilities

everybody is well aware that their "sickness" knows no bounds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. They certainly must have bumped into each other!
The WH is large... but not THAT big!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
59. I believe that the Gannon visits were more sinister than a sexual trist
I believe that many of his visits were work (catapulting the propaganda) related. IIRC, some of his more coherent blog posts were made at times that corresponds to times that he was logged in as being on the WH premises long after any other members of the press were there. IMO those posts were written by rove on jimmy-jeff's laptop.

Of course, this is not to say that ALL of his visits were propaganda related. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #59
73. Yeah, even hard-working propaganda catapulters
gotta have a little fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #59
90. Gannon sexual trist? - yep, that's Gannon's schtick...
sinister? nah, boy-toy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
64. In the NRA office?
Weren't they going to be working out of the WH as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. But, but * said he doesn't know the guy!
How could this be? Could the logs be lying?
Or,
Could someone else be lying? Anyone see pants on fire anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. maybe he was helping Mehlman with the phone calls to New Hampshire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
62. Maybe he really doesn't
If that were the case it brings up one possibility and question with limitless possibilities:

1) He visited with scrubbie 200 times and in scrubs toke infested brain he is unable to remember anything. Which would of course, call into question whether he is mentally stable to continue being the president.

or

2) He was visiting someone else. Which begs the question "Who was he visiting and why?" Cheney? Rove? Cheney and Rove? Rice, Cheney and Rove? The possibilities are limitless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. According to Black Jack Abramoff...
Bush has a fantastic political memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hee Hee Hee!!!!!
"every single work day":rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewoden Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. He simply had to make a lot of visits. . .
You see, ever since the 1000 dollar bill was eliminated from the currency (Drug trafficing and Central American government engineering), carrying around lots of cash for, er, political purposes involves very heavy stacks of hundreds! You simply cannot carry enough cash to buy off a Presidency in a simple briefcase anymore. Damn that war on drugs anyway!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seattleman Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ha Ha Ha Ha ha.
Unfortunately, the joke is going to be on the American people because the media will ignore this information as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. you got it...just as they ignore the new Plame twist, re: Iran nukes,
the Goss involvement in hookers when he was a congressman...make that the ENTIRE congressional hooker thing, and something else that just came out, which I've already forgotten myself

they ignore EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
85. Colbert..
they ignore Colbert...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Hi Seattleman, welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seattleman Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Thanks
Thanks, I am a long time web surfer, but new to DU. I appreciate your welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Welcome S Man
Is it true that people from Seattle don't tan - they rust?
Only kidding - I love your beautiful city.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
71. Same reaction here
I can't stop laughing. Too bad most people will miss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. That means that he worked there full time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. OMG...
...haha, I MUST know what Bush's pet name for Abramoff was.

"Master"

"Daddy Warbucks"

"He Who Bringeth the Hookers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
70. Wait, I thought it was a different GOP scandal who supplied the hookers
damn, I'm getting so confused keeping my criminals straight. The novel about this criminal (mis)Administration is going to be longer than Moby Dick combined with War and Peace. Heck, it's going to have to be split into volumes.

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 1, 2000

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 2, 2001

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 3, 2002

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 4, 2003

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 5, 2004

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 6, 2005

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 7, 2006

The Corrupt GOP White House, Vol 8, Special Impeachment Edition (updated with conviction and sentencing reports)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. But the Chimperor doesn't know Abramoff! Remember this?
Edited on Tue May-02-06 07:23 PM by ocelot
On January 26, here's what he said:

"President Bush fended off questions Thursday about White House links to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and refused to release photos that show the two men together. "I don't know him," Bush said.

"I had my picture taken with him, evidently," Bush said at a White House news conference. "I've had my picture taken with a lot of people. Having my picture taken with someone doesn't mean that I'm a friend with them or know them very well."

"It's part of the job of the president to shake hands ... with people and smile," he said."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-01-26-bush_x.htm

Nope, he doesn't know the guy who visited every damn day for ten months...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
77. He doesn't know Kenny Boy either (EOM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. That is a whole boat-load of visits
You can't help but tie the two together... Come on now....:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe Bush & Cheney ain't sweating Libby and Rove
Maybe the real fear is what Abramoff is blabbing about THEM and not just DeLay! One can only hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. I Guess Scalia Knew What He Was Talkin About With Them Orgy Thingys !!!
Jack and Jeff and Scotty and Ken and...

:shrug:

Not a pretty picture, mind you.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. They won't feel any need to spin it
The American people don't give a shit. They'd rather hate on "illegals."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. link please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. check edited header OP
Edited on Tue May-02-06 07:57 PM by Gabi Hayes


they were talking about another Judicial Watch lawsuit that involved suing for the WH logs. that's how they know now how many times JA visited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't you know
in Bush's world everyday is Hanukkah?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. That list will be interesting on SO many levels.
Does the arrested staffer Safavian have a chance of becoming the bushbot scapegoat? Perhaps the recently indicted and parked Scooter? Perhaps Lee Atwater's bad love copy, the retched Karl Rove? Somebody signed for him and there seems to be a former executive assistant of Karl's that went Commerce, iirc. Before Karl she worked with, guess who - Abramoff. Abramoff may have exaggerated the number, but the content of those meetings is the most important. What got traded and who cut the deals right from 1600. Abramoff probably has a house full of White House memorabilia too.

Or maybe Abramoff and Gannon just carpooled...This pig gets uglier and uglier for the lipstick suppliers of 1600.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Susan Ralston was a former Abramoff acquaintance. He 'gave' her to Rove
when they took over the WH. She became Rove's assistant. She has been before the Plame GJ a few times, probably in relationg to what she knew about Rove.

Susan Ralston supposedly took all of Rove's calls, and would have to check with Norquist before deciding who should and should not have access. I remember reading that somewhere.

In some of the Abramoff e-mails, he would contact Ralph Reed if he wanted something from Rove (apparently Reed had a good relationship with Rove).

As I recall, Norquist was a mentor to Ralph Reed, Abramoff and I think, Adam Kidan (who entered a guilty plea also re the Suncruz corruption case). They were all in college together, 'young Republicans'.

When the emails were released, I remember wondering if Bush had a clue what was going on in the WH, or did he let Karl handle all this, and get a report later.

You're right about how ugly all this is ~ it's hard to believe that such a bunch of lunatics had so much power for so long over the lives of so many people. It makes you wonder who is watching out for this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. The fatal Abramoff Disease seems to be on the Rove side of the
White House. That puts an interesting squeeze play in motion about which scandal decks and frog marches Rove first, Abramoff/Delay/Reed/Norquist/Kidan versus Mr. Wilson's wife. This is a Den of Iniquity that really needs a great narrative for the American public to catch on how corrupt and evil this administration has been. It would be actually great TV if it was done in a way that people could watch it or read about it that made it compelling to a general audience.

These guys have put Ceasar to shame with putting their hubris ahead of the common good for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
55. Yes, I find it fascinating since I started following it. There are so many
twists and turns, so many crimes, from the Marianas Islands to China to Africa, Israel, Russia not to mention right here, regarding Abramoff, Tom Delay, the Christian Right, gambling, Mohammad Atta, Bob Ney, even Duke Cunningham may have been involved with Abramoff.

He's like the energizer bunny, he's involved everywhere, the K St. Progject alone would make incredible TV.

Then there are the other scandals, Lies about war, Voting Machine corruption, Enron, Spies in the Pentagon (sometimes I think that is the one that could get all of them for treason, Cheney, Condy, Wolfowitz and the rest of the neocons). The Plame affair, the Forged Niger Documents ~ it's endless.

If the media had started following all this from the beginning, any one of the scandals, (and now we have the prostitute/defense contractor/Cunningham scandal developing) they would have had huge ratings. That's why it's so puzzling that they did not. And of course, Jeff Gannon and why a male prostitute was in the WH.

They are stories of greed, ambition, war profiteering, treason, corruption, sex, spies! It would have been great TV, better than all the reality shows. Now it would take so long for the media to catch up. I can't keep up with the scandals, they'd have to do it in stages, and show how they all come back to the same people. It would take years!

But you're right, tragic though it all is, it would be great for television. People would glued to their tvs, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Piggly Perfect!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. I guess I could Google this,
but can you give a source?

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:39 PM
Original message
I edited the header to show a link, but it doesn't discuss how many visits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. So, he was there more often than Bush? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. now THAT's the post of the DAY, at least!
love you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Stand Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
80. Someone had to water the plants.
I think the fact that the agency pursuing the information about the Abramoff vists is a CONSERVATIVE group is extra delicious here. It's about time some of these so-called conservatives put their backing on their ideologies instead of some Dimwit who's spending all of their and our money on new yaghts for his Cronies. I'm no fan of the penny-pinching libertarians, but some of their ideology was legit at one time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. Welcome to DU, Last Stand!
I totally agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. and on may 10
we should find out who he was seeing during those visits. the secret service has reached an agreement with Judicial watch to turn over the logs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Holy Crap! I Didn't Expect It To Be That Many!
Edited on Tue May-02-06 07:38 PM by Beetwasher
I mean, I knew there would be visits, but, wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. He was at the White House more than Bush hisself!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. EXACTLY how we need to frame it! Spot on! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. More than every day.
Camp David, Crawford, holidays known and unknown...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. Well, Bush broke the record for vacation time
It must have been all that "hard work" defrauding 'We The People' with his criminal buddies. Georgie just couldn't keep up and handed the keys to the White House, over to the criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. Perhaps the freepers can explain this
Any takers out there? We know 'your' here. So tell us all what exactly is a soon-to-be convicted felon doing in the WH every day for ten months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. That would be
"you're"

Just sayin'...;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. That's the freeper you're--hence the bracketing
OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleVet Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Well , here's one freeptard who's going to be MIGHTY disappointed!
(Replying to a previous post: White House Visitor Logs should be an open book, with some option for censoring visits related to national security.)

----
"I don't have a problem with this, esp. if it was something like a web site with all the names. It would help put things in context. For example, it might look damaging if Abramoff was there a dozen times, but not if there were hundreds who did the same thing. "
----


If it "might look damaging if Abramoff was there a dozen times", how is it going to look to these guys if he was there a COUPLE OF HUNDRED times? Let's see if we can help this guy and come up with a word that would express this...perhaps "devastating"?

Maybe "incriminating"?

How about "impeacable"?

Oh, well. I guess it won't matter to them - they're already screaming that the logs should be released all the way to the beginning of the Mighty Clenis' term. We all knew that there HAD to be a way to blame Clinton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. Can't be
Bush didn't know the man :sarcasm::sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Lincoln bedroom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politrix Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. DAMN! They Cut Him A "Doggie Door"
Hey, that's a good phrase for this kind of access. The sucker had his own doggie door to the whitehouse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. speaking of which, I wonder how much doggy style was going on
under Pickles' nose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. Oh, Gabi!
That was good! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. Pickles' nick name is
Lash Laura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. They cut him a "doggie door".
That's great! Did you come up with that?

And, welcome to DU, politrix.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politrix Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #49
61. Thanks, Bleever - Yeah, It's The First Thing That Came To Mind
He basically had access whenever he wanted it.

I DO think that's a good buzzword for it, tho'. Think of the cartoons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
46. I never met that man in my life!!!
I think we found the blue dress!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. Something doesn't add up
Edited on Tue May-02-06 08:49 PM by burythehatchet
The White Press secretary stated that Abramoff was at the White House for 3...no 2 Hannukah receptions. Where's the disconnect?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Another reason they had to get Scottie out of there
Too much tape of Scottie saying stuff like that.

Now Snowball can lie w a clean slate. And I hear they want to stop televising the briefings. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. Yep
And now they are talking about no more tv coverage. All holy hell is about to break loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I don't think I believe this story. I had heard "200" - but it was
200 "contacts" (eg phone, email, in person) combined.

Not that that is any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Today, McC said he wasn't even sure the SS kept records of WH visits
There is definitely a disconnect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. Well, what's the problem?
He WAS there for two Hanukah receptions. And about 198 other times too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
51. What a tangled web they weave...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Panda1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-02-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
63. And * says he didn't know Jack........
next thing you know we will find out he got a payroll check. Probably got a Christmas bonus too.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
65. Was he porkin' the first lady on the sly, OR
Edited on Wed May-03-06 04:40 AM by Hubert Flottz
did we catch Gawd's Chosen Chimp in yet another of his Gawd sent barrages of Gawd Damned Bullshit?

EDIT...He's a such MORAL WAR pResident, would he ever lie? Would He Ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
66. AN INCREDULOUS KICK nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
67. bushie* the liar will only lie about it, mark my word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
68. They won't spin it - they will ignore it
The media will not be allowed to report on it, other than Olbermann & a joke on the Daily Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
72. Is anyone else utterly agog at the sheer nerve it requires to...
lie one's ass off when documentary evidence abounds to the contrary?

Dear Mr. President, we're not dumb and we're not blind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #72
84. I am. What were they thinking?
That the info would never get out, i.e. they could cover it up?
That they could claim that nobody knew he was there?
I mean, why lie? Did they not check the records first before saying he was hardly ever there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
74. Ohhh!! the humanity!!!!!
Colbert's Hindenburg is about to blow!
If this story is true there is no way that the WH can escape this disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
75. Kick!! n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
76. they spin it by ignoring it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donovan61 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
78. I am shocked
shocked, I tell you, to learn there is corruption in the White House. By the way, I'm sure Bush doesn't know Abrahamoff, Ken Lay, Tom DeLay, Scooter Libby and a whole host of GOP congressmen to be named later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
79. It's obvious Abramoff never visited the White House
He was LIVING there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
81. It seems that 200 visits should bring forth more then what was revealed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
82. "Incomplete"
What is this thing I read in the paper this morning, that the White House has said it will only turn over "incomplete" records? :shrug: How can they keep getting away with this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #82
89.  "Incomplete"? - it's what you get with no checks and balances
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
83. spin it? They won't have to spin it
No one is even really talking about Abramoff anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
86. And Didn't Kenny-boy Lay have an office and desk in the WH too?
I seem to recall that, so let's not forget him either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
87. Kicked and recommended. Infinitely more significant than Colberts
comedy routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC