Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Congress' Watchdog Plan 'Scary'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 03:05 PM
Original message
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Congress' Watchdog Plan 'Scary'
Ginsburg: Congress' Watchdog Plan 'Scary'

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: May 2, 2006
Filed at 10:23 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Tuesday that a Republican proposal in Congress to set up a watchdog over the federal courts is a ''really scary idea.''

Ginsburg told a gathering of the American Bar Association that lawyers should stick up for judges when they are criticized by congressional leaders.

''My sense now is that the judiciary is under assault in a way that I haven't seen before,'' she said.

..............

''It sounds to me very much like the Soviet Union was .... That's a really scary idea,'' said Ginsburg, who was put on the court by President Clinton and is one of its liberal members.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Ginsburg-Congress.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would feel a lot better if Congress would return to
their traditional role of being the watchdog of the Executive Branch instead of the Judicial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm, what did Specter say today
Oh, yeah . . . I thought the comment was rather odd, and this article reminded me of it.

This is from the Boston Globed regarding hearings to be held regarding Shrub's signing statements:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/05/03/hearing_vowed_on_bushs_powers/?page=2

Specter said that challenging Bush's contention that he can ignore laws written by Congress should be a matter of institutional pride for lawmakers. He also connected Bush's defiance of laws to several Supreme Court decisions in which the justices ruled that Congress had not done enough research to justify a law.

''We're undergoing a tsunami here with the flood coming from the executive branch on one side and the judicial branch on the other," Specter said. ''There may as well soon not be a Congress. . . . And I think that most members don't understand what's happening."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well if Specter says there may as well not be a Congress, and
Ginsburg says the judiciary is under assault like never before, I guess the only thing that leaves us with is a Decidership. Heaven help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. First, the "minders" were assigned to scientists at NOAA
to suppress global warming information. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/10/AR2006021001766_pf.html

Now, the federal courts.

Next, ????

This is just all so wrong.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC