Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: House Passes Sham Ethics Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:02 PM
Original message
BREAKING: House Passes Sham Ethics Reform
BREAKING: House Passes Sham Ethics Reform

House conservatives just passed their “sham” lobbying reform bill by a narrow 217-214 vote. The Washington Post called the legislation “diluted snake oil” and “an insult to voters.” Instead of the comprehensive reform promised by lawmakers in early 2006, this bill fails to reform parts of the system most in need.

A look at what this bill is missing:

– No Restrictions on Lavish Gifts: Current gift limits will remain unchanged.

– No Ban Free Exotic Trips: Lawmakers will still be able to accept lavish privately-funded trips from lobbyists.

– No Increase in Lobbyist Transparency: Lobbyists can continue to pay $25,000 or $50,000 for a campaign fundraiser, with no oversight.

– No Ethics Training for Members: Ethics training will be mandatory for all congressional staff, but not for members

more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/03/house-sham-ethics/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. GOoD! This will be a GREAT documented issue for the Dems
to run on in Nov!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But they won't...Because they would need spines to do that....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. 217-214
Appears like quite a few Republicans thought it was a sham as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'A plague on both of your houses'
It's broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC