Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Says No To Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:34 PM
Original message
Congress Says No To Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq
WASHINGTON, May 3 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Responding to a huge wave of popular opposition to U.S. war plans in Iraq, the full Senate today declared the United States should not establish permanent military bases in Iraq and added a clear statement that the U.S. does not wish to control Iraq's oil resources. The Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) congratulated Sen. Joseph Biden (DE) on winning approval for the measure, which specifically prohibits the use of any new funds to establish permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq. The House passed a similar ban in March.

"This is an important milestone in the development of U.S. policy toward Iraq. For the first time since the U.S. launched the invasion of Iraq in 2003, both chambers of Congress have now said the U.S. must change course in Iraq," said Joe Volk, Executive Secretary of FCNL, the 63-year-old Quaker lobby that has the largest team of peace lobbyists working on Capitol Hill.

The president recently said U.S. troops will remain in Iraq at least until 2009, while senior U.S. military commanders have argued in public testimony that the U.S. may decide to permanently station military troops in Iraq. "The Senate vote today sends a clear signal to the people of Iraq, to the international community, and to the people of this country that the United States does not intend to permanently occupy Iraq," said Joe Volk. "This Congressional action also is a strong signal that the Bush administration has to change policy in Iraq now."

FCNL, the oldest registered religious lobby in Washington, has been working for more than a year to persuade Congress to declare "It is the policy of the United States to withdraw all U.S. military troops and bases from Iraq." The full Senate today approved by voice vote an amendment to the Iraq war supplemental appropriations bill offered by Sen. Joseph Biden that states "None of the funds made available by title I of this Act may be made available to establish permanent military bases in Iraq or to exercise control over the oil infrastructure or oil resources of Iraq."

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=65133

http://www.life-connections.net.nyud.net:8090/images/PCakes%20Flying.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thats good to read maybe the dems are growing the spine they so badly need
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That brush is too broad
And more than a little insulting to many Democrats. I see it all the time and I understand the frustration that perpetuates the cliche. Please consider that it feeds a demeaning and inaccurate portrayal of all dems that has lasted for decades, to the delight of the RW.

MANY Democrats do not lack for courage: Murtha, Conyers, Boxer, Feingold are but a few...

Since July 03 a group of Dems formed "Iraq Watch" and have spoken passionately against the war with late night time stolen from the GOP House schedule. Archives can be found here
http://www.house.gov/inslee/issues/iraq/iraq_watch.html

Fifty House Democrats Form 'Out of Iraq Caucus'
Monday 20 June 2005
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/37/12004#1

Currenly there are 71 in that caucus, listed here
http://democracyrising.us/content/view/288/165/

Lee, Co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus said the White House still refuses to respond to questions about the Downing Street Minutes despite signatures from 500,000 Americans and 100 Members of Congress.
...
"Two-thirds of current House Democrats one-half of current Senate Democrats opposed the resolution empowering Bush to use force."
http://www.counterpunch.org/gray11212005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if Bush doesn't agree with Congress, he'll just do it anyway.
After all, he reserves the right to not follow any law that impedes his Presidential powers. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. that was my thought as well
Does Bush really care what Congress does or does not do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. what a joke
since when does bush listen to congress? Since when has he been held accountable for not? Newsflash congress critters! The bases are built, the $700 million dollar embassy is almost complete and we are STAYING!

They should have thought of this before they crowned him king of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heartofthesiskiyou Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I saw it. It broke out into
a real cat fight on the floor. Her problems, Rep. Cynthia McKinney's getting into the building best not be confused with how she functions IN the building. She was strong and wasn't getting pushed around. They tried. They lost... Like wow. Dem's are getting on the feisty end of the spectrum lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. THis is because they've ALREADY BUILT THEM..
and of course it won't be the US building them, it will be a contractor, HALLIBURTON, so there's the SPIN in the first place..

Second is what the other poster wrote, that each bill gets signed into law with the words, NEENER NEENER NEENER penned in by Bush at the bottom.

Biden is grandstanding, and is an idiot. He knows what people want to hear and bends to the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, what you have to do is to write a law which makes it illegal to
Edited on Wed May-03-06 08:17 PM by BuyingThyme
spend any money on such projects.

Did they do that? Or are they pretending not to know how these things work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who you trying to con
There already superbases in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Your beef is with the Quakers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Simple
Those bases has been going up for a long time
Dont tell me all the Congresscritters and Senators dont know what money use for.
It is your money they are spending and it is your right to know where they spend it.
But even though with all the hue and cry
Billions seem to disappear.
And what so far been done..... on yeah some clinic thingy yeah yeah job being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bwaahahahaha
Congress passes a resolution saying what its POLICY is?

their POLICY is not to torture, either.

WTF?

this country is beyond insane. Beyond fucking insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Aren't they "enduring bases" or something like that - & not permanent
bases? Does this bill cover all the types of bases that might be built? Aren't they a little late? They've been building those things for 2 years now. Are they done or have more to build?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. But, but, but.....
* got some "Divine Dictation" that will certainly supercede Congress' best intentions!

Holy Moses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-03-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. The city sized embassy doesn't count as a base?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC