Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove, this is for you......ENJOY !!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:35 AM
Original message
Rove, this is for you......ENJOY !!!!
We’ve waited and we’ve waited but this week or next, I’m willing to state that our dreams will come true.

You bloated face pig, you’re next !!!!






ITEM...:bluebox: Only two days after Pat meets with his new grand jury for the first time, Rove is testifying. Not some other witness. Rove.

ITEM...:bluebox: He wasn't subpoenaed. There would be a court record unless it was under seal and it would make no sense for Fitzgerald to do that. Obviously we would know immediately he's testifying as soon as he went in.

ITEM...:bluebox: The reason he puts out for his fifth appearance is that he just has a little dusting and polishing to do on the one issue regarding Cooper. Yet he’s in there for three and a half hours ! That indicates to me that jury was frying him on one side, then turning him over and grilling him on the other. I contend Fitzgerald with all he had told them, had them seething already just waiting for a chance to get at him.

ITEM...:bluebox: We know Rove lied already. It's not conjecture or speculation. We know it ! Rove said his meeting with Cooper was mostly about the WMD and almost nothing about Plame. But Cooper testified, it was almost all about Wilson and Plame. And a statement Rove had made stuck in his mind for TWO years; That statement, "I've said too much already." Rove, has now said he just didn’t remember the conversation that way. No, I bet ] he doesn’t. Little late for that.

What would be Coopers motivation to lie? Absolutely none! What would be Rove's? Not wanting
to be on the receiving end of what-hole-do-you-want-it-in sex in a federal penitentiary for the
next twenty years. Rove was begging for three and a half hours last Wednesday to this grand jury.
That’s what he was doing. Doing his best–please, oh please don’t indict me. I didn’t mean to lie.
I really didn’t. I just got confused, busy man. You think they bought that ?

ITEM...:bluebox: For Seven months Luskin knows Fitzgerald is aware that Rove may have been Cooper's source, after he had been tipped off by Viveca Novak. But Luskin does NOTHING. Only when Luskin finds out that Fitzgerald has subpoenaed Novak to testify before the grand jury, now he shits his pants and produces the long lost "forgotten" email from Rove. This alone could easily constitute obstruction.

ITEM...:bluebox: Rove is named as official "A" in the Libby indictment. Every individual in the history of Pat Fitzgerald's career as a prosecutor who has been named as official A in another indictment, they have been indicted.

ITEM...:bluebox: An official statement from Fitzgerald’s office effectively states there will be a "decision" in approximately ten days. What reason would Fitzgerald have to make a statement that there would not be charges against anyone? He's not required to make a report of his findings, and it's not like Fitzgerald to just create a photo opportunity. You have to drag Fitzgerald in front of a camera.

But even more, a "no indictment" announcement would almost have to signal the end of the
investigation and shut down of this grand jury. Why would he do that? That makes no sense
either. Keeping this grand jury active gives him great flexibility for additional witnesses as
they’re found relevant for more evidence in the Libby trial. He has the use of this jury for
another two years before it expires. Why would he give up that ace? They’re already totally
versed in the testimony of the original jury. That’s much more pressure and problem for Libby.

Also, I totally believe Fitzgerald suspects more rats in this woodpile; I'm talking all the
way up to Bush and Cheney. I don't believe for a minute he's done with this grand jury.

ITEM...:bluebox: Bush has now been proven to be caught and revealed to have told one lie after another, with an attempt to cover it up. Secret prisons, torture, Abu Ghraib, rendition, NSA spying, signing statements, turning over port security to UAE terrorist sympathizers for profit, proof he knew Hussein was no threat yet lied to Congress--to name only a few. Do you think Fitzgerald doesn't have a cornucopia of lies in Bush's and Cheney's depositions? These were taken before ANY of their criminal corruption was discovered; and they thought it never would be. Do you think Fitzgerald isn’t just sitting back and salivating over what he’s got in those depositions? Which way do you think Rove would get a stronger message to see the light to turn on Bush? If he's indicted? Or just the threat?

ITEM...:bluebox: As the indictment was being handed up to the judge for Libby, legal commentators noticed an envelope clipped to the indictment. None of them had ever seen that before. What was in that envelope? Obviously it’s reasonable to assume it didn’t have anything to do with the Libby indictment. The indictment was the indictment. Everything was spelled out in the 5 count complaint and a long press conference explained every detail. There would be no need for a mystery envelope regarding Libby. So that envelope contained something Fitzgerald wanted on record that he had approved by the judge and also signed by that grand jury. Something he wasn’t ready to go public with yet, but wanted official record of for immediate presentation to his new grand jury. I contend that was a Rove related envelope. And possibly even named unindicted co-conspirators.

ITEM...:bluebox: All the witnesses who testified and that have now disclosed their personal testimony have all been detrimental to Rove; Cooper, Woodward, Miller, Novak, (probably Viveca and Bob both), Russert, Libby. Certainly Hadley was devastating. He's probably scrambling to save his own ass and rolled HARD on Rove. I bet Susan Ralston also told Fitzgerald plenty. She’s been a highly placed assistant to both Libby and Rove. And she knows a lot!

ITEM...:bluebox: Think about this. What was new that Rove could have possibly told Fitzgerald or this grand jury that he hadn't already told the last grand jury? NOTHING!!!! He'd already shot his wad with everything he could come up with, and he thought he was in the clear because of only the Libby indictment. Yet he's back for the 5th time before a new grand jury as soon as Fitzgerald gets back to town !! All he could possibly have been doing is desperately trying to put more lipstick and rouge and eye shadow and wrinkle cream on that same pig. I think Fitzgerald is having a literal field day catching him in one lie after another, and knowing he gets in deeper with every appearance. Just giving him more and better evidence each time to use in his trial.

ITEM...:bluebox: It’s reported now that Rove is worried sick that he's got felony charges coming after his last "pure hell" with this grand jury. His words apparently, describing the experience.

ITEM...:bluebox: Luskin is spinning lawyer speak like never before. He doesn't any longer say Rove is home free. In fact, he now admits he's a “subject.”

ITEM...:bluebox: Insiders, and credible federal prosecutor experts are more and more noticeably rumbling about the ominous signs of expected indictment to come. It's almost palpable. Almost none are saying anything encouraging for Rove.

ITEM...:bluebox: Finally...We’re talking about Fitzgerald here. Fitzgerald . The man who secured the indictment of the first Whitehouse aid to be indicted in 130 YEARS!! The man who convinced a federal Republican judge to jail a reporter normally thought to have immunity to protect their sources, The man who assisted in the prosecution of John Gatti, the most slippery crime boss of all time. The man who prosecuted all twelve of the bombers of the 1993 World Trade Center. And the man who spent seven years and obtained SIXTY indictments against the highest government officials in the city of Chicago. Then capped it off with a criminal jury trial that found the governor guilty on every count.


I'll tell ya, if this doesn’t spell indictment, I spent my years as a detective for nothing. I want my money back. I'm going to go out and look for the real killer of Nicole Simpson. Then, I'm going to go live on that moon that's made out of swiss cheese.

Bartender give me another round :beer: And give me a couple scoops of them buttered cashews while you're at it. Rove, it's over!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think...
the indictment could come down this week? Please say, "Yes"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am thinking next week. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Leopold has said his source(s) predict a press conference
will be announced today and take place tomorrow...

So should we start a pool of times for the announcement? If so, I get zero time...there will be no press conference announced today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm ordering my Fitz bumpersticker, what have I been waiting for?

http://www.cafepress.com/massmadness.34697365


And thank you Justice Is Comin... you made my day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Top of the World Ma!
Edited on Thu May-04-06 07:54 AM by annces8
crash, burn.

 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. maybe but Rove is a good talker--I will count my chickie when hatched



.....The reason he puts out for his fifth appearance is that he just has a little dusting and polishing to do on the one issue regarding Cooper. Yet he’s in there for three and a half hours ! That indicates to me that jury was frying him on one side, then turning him over and grilling him on the other. I contend Fitzgerald with all he had told them, had them seething already just waiting for a chance to get at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Take him down "Cops" style...
...falling facefirst in his yard wearing just a dirty undershirt.

Bad boys, bad boys...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Your timing is perfect...
I was just cleaning my kitchen cupboards and suddenly realized how intent I have been on celebrating the Downfall of Rove. So far, I have found 5 unopened boxes of microwave popcorn, ranging from Orville Redenbacher's buttered white to store brand yellow unsalted. Let's party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestHoustonDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Fitzmas2006 is almost here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've been saving my jug of Absolut and my liver...
for Fitzmas, on or about the 4th of July. Justice Is Comin...and it's long overdue in this case.

I think you are a master of deduction...keep up the good work! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wow. Excellent summary. Thanks for cheering me up
"it's beginning to look a lot like Fitzmas!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Same here!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. ITEM...You can get a Grand Jury to Indict a HAM SANDWICH...
And in this case, it's a DAGWOOD SANDWICH that's 100% PURE BEEF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Actually I think Rove is made of
fish-heads and tripe. But your point is well taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. There is the possibility that he was singing like a birdie as well.
And he is ratting on Shooter.

But, if that is not the case, you are probably correct and he was being questioned by the GJ itself.

Rove is really screwed one way or the other.

Neh neh neh neh neh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Bushes are harder to catch than the mafia though
"But even more, a "no indictment" announcement would almost have to signal the end of the
investigation and shut down of this grand jury. Why would he do that?"

If there are no more indictments then one would think that the whole judicial system is corrupt and working for the junta. Time to get ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Trust these DUers. They're telling you how you'll be saved from
Dumbya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. Great analysis you made my day!
:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Another thought
that mysterious package that was handed the judge with the Libby indictment. Could that have been a sealed indictment?? And Rove made a deal long ago, and has been cooperating the whole time. And all that Viveca and Luskin stuff has been a beard?? I read somewhere in the last couple of days that Viveca got a buyout from Time VERY recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Rove is indicted will Bush say he hasn't been convicted...
of anything and still keep Rove on?

And like Libby, Rove's case won't even be heard until next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. What about contacting the...
...guys that did "Cheney's Got a Gun," which was great, and see if they'd be interested in doing a variation on Buffalo Springfield's anti-war song "For What It's Worth."


My alterations to the lyrics:

There's something happening here
What it is is perfectly clear
There's a man with a briefcase over there
Tellin' Karl he's got to beware
I think it's time we stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down

/ E - A - / / / / E D A C /

There's battle lines being drawn
Fitzgerald's right, and BushCo is wrong
Americans speaking their minds
Getting so much resistance from the Neocon kind
I think it's time we stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down

What a field-day for the heat
Before a grand jury, Karl takes a seat
Singing songs and tellin' his side
Sayin', I'll give you Cheney if you'll spare my hide
It's time we stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life fascist Neocons creep
It starts when you're always afraid
You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down
Stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down
Stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down
Stop BushCo, what's that sound
Multi-count indictments comin' down

--------------------------------------------

Here are the actual lyrics:

ARTIST: Buffalo Springfield
TITLE: For What It's Worth
Lyrics and Chords


There's something happening here
What it is ain't exactly clear
There's a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware
I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down

/ E - A - / / / / E D A C /

There's battle lines being drawn
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
Young people speaking their minds
Getting so much resistance from behind
I think it's time we stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down

What a field-day for the heat
A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side
It's time we stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid
You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, now, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. But why won't you answer my question?
Edited on Thu May-04-06 02:09 PM by LaPera
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. That's a beautiful presentation!
You are good at this!!

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. And what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. R - OVEr
I hope he's thrown in the can. It's been a long time coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. However, what if...
Edited on Thu May-04-06 03:16 PM by LaPera
Rove is indicted, won't Bush just simply say, (as is Bush's way) that Rove hasn't been convicted of anything and we'll wait and see before we make a decision, while still keeping Rove on...to work his evil but very effective black magic to steal elections for the republicans this November...

And like Libby, Rove's case won't even be heard until next year, and perhaps even longer.

Rove far too valuable with his lies, distortion, smears and manipulations for Bush & the republicans to ask him or tell him to step down. (Even if this scenario were to happen, one would be somewhat naive NOT to believe Rove would still be asked to pull strings in the background by Bush).

Please let me know your thoughts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It won't surprise me at all if Rove still works behind the scenes
doing his dirty politics. Wouldn't him being a possible felon make him even more desirable as a dirty trickster?

OTOH, Bush will personally pay a big price in his popularity if Rove isn't banished from Washington upon being indicted. I can't predict at this time what Bushco will do - it's a wait and see game for me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Kinda like a Mafia boss directing operations from his prison cell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. THANKS!
Your name saying it all: Justice is coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
30. ChumP!
:)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. "You bloated face pig"....HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I love it!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glenda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. that cracked me up too!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nice work and great summary! Only one question:
Isn't it true that Bush wouldn't testify without Cheney present, and when they did, they only did so together without being under oath?'

If so, you can't call Bush's testimony a "deposition". Depositions are pre-trial testimony under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. No Seabiscuit
They each testified on two separate days. Bush was on June 24, 2004. And Cheney was a few weeks before that. It's hard to get a definite date on Cheney. But on June 5th, 2004, CBS news cited a NYT article stating that Cheney had recently been questioned by Fitzgerald. So Cheney was questioned approximately the beginning of June.

They both hired private attorneys. That is noteworthy. And both were questioned about 70 minutes.

You are right that they were not under oath. Deposition is the wrong word, technically they were interviews. But they both had attorneys and Fitzgerald brilliantly had his associates with him. Fitzgerald is no dumbie.

Neither of them was without counsel when they were interviewed. So Fitzgerald could have his prosecutors testify as "witnesses" to what was said. They are officers of the court. No doubt they were taking extemperanous notes, and that is essentially just as good as if the interviews had been recorded.

Also any false statement made by Bush or Cheney would be prosecutable under the False Statements act. It doesn't require an oath.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. Thanks for the info.
Any testimony or notes by Fitzgerald's fellow prosecutors who attended their interviews would be admissible in court but wouldn't have quite the same effect as testimony under oath, especially if they perjured themselves under oath. Remember, it was Clinton's testimony under oath at his deposition in the Paula Jones case (denying having "sexual relations" with Monica Lewinsky) that led to his grand jury testimony, all of which became the target of an impeachment inquiry, and consideration of perjury charges.

So the big difference here is that neither Bush nor Cheney could be charged with perjury for whatever they said in those interviews, nor could any sworn testimony be used against them at Libby's or Rove's trial whether or not they changed their stories there.

I'm not familiar with the False Statements Act - could you enlighten me?

Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Sure. This is the money shot.
Edited on Sat May-06-06 10:40 AM by Justice Is Comin
The actual federal statute is Title 18--Section 1001. But here is a non technical description.



From ABC News


Oct. 28, 2005 — Perjury and false statements are both felonies, punishable under federal law by up to five years in prison. While the two crimes have similar elements, there are some important distinctions. Here is an explanation:




False Statement

The crime of false statement involves knowingly and willfully making a false statement to a government official (such as an investigator) about a material fact, or falsifying or covering up a material fact. This latter point includes knowingly omitting information that is material. The key point is the speaker's intent: that the speaker has knowingly made the false statement, or omitted relevant information.

A material fact is information of fundamental importance to a case, not information either peripheral or irrelevant to the issue being investigated.


Perjury

A person commits perjury when he intentionally lies under oath, usually while testifying in court, administrative hearings, depositions, or in answers to interrogatories. Perjury can also be committed by knowingly signing or acknowledging a written legal document (such as affidavit, declaration under penalty of perjury, deed, license application, tax return) that contains false information.

Perjury can be difficult to prove. The testimony of one witness is not enough to support evidence that the testimony was false. There must be additional evidence, from either the testimony of another person or other evidence.

A person can be charged with both crimes if the same lie is repeated — once under oath before a grand jury and again to investigators during the course of an investigation. Prosecutors normally choose to charge someone under one or the other.


In addition, "officers of the court" which is what Fitzgerald's FBI and assistant prosecutors would be, are given great weight as to the credibility of their testimony. Especially if "work product" notes were taken during the interview. They are almost unimpeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-06-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Thank you. It's nice to know Bush/Cheney could still be charged
with a crime for any false statements made to Fitzgerald during their interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. A top prosecutor
would not spend this much time and energy investigating the WH unless he was going to go for the whole enchilada. It's much too serious a matter to risk ruining careers and wasting everyones' time.

Rove is next and it will be soon. Unless Libby's team tries to throw another monkey wrench, but I think they'll be pushing it with the judge if they do.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. Wooodamnwhooo!
Edited on Thu May-04-06 06:36 PM by lonestarnot
I'll :beer::drink: to that! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. My fantasy Rove photo op
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
38. Hopefully there will be NO Trial for a year or so..
by then Bush will be IMPEACHED, along with Cheney and no one will be left to Pardon the rotten scum.
Maybe Fitz has Bush & Cheney in his sights also..somewhere down this long and twisted road he's found himself on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. Smile real purdy now Rove, ya hear?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
40. The Pelican Brief., Rove and George Bush...
There is a scene in the Pelican Brief where the President of the United States, played by Robert Culp, is advised by his advisor that the jig is up. Before he goes in to tell the President, the advisor shuts down the microphones to the security cameras that are in the Oval Office, so you see everything through those security cameras in black and white. The advisor goes in, he whispers something in the President's ear and the president's shoulders hunch down as he fully comprehends what's coming next.

Do you know, that if Rove is now serving up George Bush to Fitzgerald, hoping for a plea bargain, and if Fitzgerald were to go to Bush and tell him the jig is up, I don't know if George Bush will fully understand why he would be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. If you're right
there is gonna be quite the party. I can't wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC