|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 05:44 PM Original message |
*Important info on how to view Library of Congress Rusher Documents(CAP)>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. One need's Rusher's permission to view the sealed (CAP) documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Kennedy asked for them to be "subpoenaed". This would unseal them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. According to the Library of Congress librarian one needs permission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. relevant excerpt (scroll down at link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 05:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Ah ha!: Containers 142-145, Concerned Alumni of Princeton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I'm pretty sure we'll get to look at these papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Ah ha!! This is why CAP appeared on the 85 application and not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Alito must be a dumbass to think no one kept records and files. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matt819 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. And if he knew that it was disbanded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Don't know what you guys are up to but I'll bet it bodes ill for some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I wanted to know if/how the Senators could view sealed documents at LoC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. makes me wonder if the same material isn't available elsewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. A long wait to get Rusher's permission will mean Alito's hearing drags on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. really? I'm afraid they'll force a vote before the House holds hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Let's cross our fingers. We're depending on Kennedy at this point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Damn, youre good... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Thanks! I used to work at a research library so I just made a call... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:08 PM Original message |
Rusher seems to have been like Zelig. He knew everyone and had a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
15. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Rusher was the original anti-liberal media evil insider. Check this out: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. the good old days of McCarthyism are alive and well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Look through the LoC link in the original post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Shameless kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. DU lawyers: can a subpoena force open sealed documents w/out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. I just heard Specter say the documents are being looked at... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. William A. Rusher, mean-looking bastard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The elephant on the bookcase is a nice touch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-12-06 12:39 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Gah! He's cadaverous! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-11-06 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
27. hummmm ... who else might we find out about? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC