Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:50 PM
Original message
Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP)
Edited on Wed Jan-11-06 05:55 PM by shance
...from People for the American Way.


- CAP complained about the admission of women to Princeton.

T. Harding Jones, Alito’s classmate and CAP’s executive director in 1974 (two years after they graduated) told the New York Times that “Co-education has ruined the mystique and the camaraderies that used to exist. Princeton has now given into the fad of the moment, and I think it’s going to prove to be a very unfortunate thing.”1


- CAP also complained about the admission of minorities to Princeton.

An alumnus wrote in 1974 in CAP’s magazine that “We had trusted the admissions office to select young men who could and would become part of the great Princeton tradition. In my day, Andy Brown would have been called to task for his open love affair with minorities.”2


- CAP repeatedly warned that the admission of women and minorities would undermine the university.

A 1973 CAP fundraising letter claimed that “a student population of approximately 40 percent women and minorities will largely vitiate the alumni body of the future.”3 And in 1974, T. Harding Jones claimed that “Annual giving has been hurt very substantially by the equal-access vote.”4


- CAP supported a quota system to ensure that the vast majority of students would continue to be men.


Asa Bushnell, then chairman of CAP, told the New York Times in 1974 that “Many Princeton graduates are unhappy over the fact that the administration has seen fit to abrogate the virtual guarantee that 800 would continue to be the number of males in each freshman class.”5


- CAP opposed affirmative action for women and minorities but supported affirmative action for athletes and the children of alumni.6


For instance, CAP principal John Thatcher argued in 1974 that “Academic weakness below the projected graduating level, or character defect, should be the only grounds for rejecting athletes.”7



- Prospect magazine, published by CAP, specialized in reactionary rhetoric and ad hominem attacks.


Feminists were labeled “frumps and freaks” and “a 1983 item on sexual harassment was illustrated with a female student sunning herself in a bikini.”8 In 1983, a column in the Prospect had the following to say about international students at Princeton: “I suppose the new students I am observing all had the required SAT scores to get into Princeton, but I really do not believe it for a minute. They are here on the basis of a theory.”9 In 1984 – the year before Alito touted his CAP membership in his job application letter – “the magazine observed the death of a female coal miner who won her job through a discrimination suit and concluded, ‘Sally Frank, take note.’” 10 Sally Frank was a Princeton student who took legal action to open the doors of exclusive, all-male eating clubs at the university to women.


- CAP advocated a quota system to ensure that humanities and social science departments hired right wing professors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Alito beonged to this group and attended meetings, why is he even
nominated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Because we are dealing with those in power who support such racism
and misogyny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beingthere Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. and Alito is saying
he didn't know or remember any of this. Believe that and I'll tell you another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely. Thats an unacceptable answer.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is what he meant by the "irrational and radical" on campus.
women and minorities. as opposed to legacy candidates and steroidal war mongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I cant believe this was allowed on the Princeton campus.
I cant imagine its still active.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC