Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

bad intelligence = sheer stupidity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:33 AM
Original message
bad intelligence = sheer stupidity
Edited on Tue May-09-06 10:36 AM by stellanoir
I've said this before and I'll keep saying it.

With this whole Goss/Hayden thingy burbling up I have to repost this.

"Aaaaand could someone "pullease" elucidate for me the seemingly nonexistent subtle distinction and difference between homeland security and national security. . .? That whole ruse is especially perturbing to me.

Let's see Prior to 9/11 we had at least three so called intelligence organizations not communicating with each other so the "towering geniuses" in charge create another big bloated behemoth bureaucracy that can't even remotely handle an adequate response to a hurricane.

How anyone considers this good governance totally escapes me. Is there anyone else who sees "bad intelligence" as being nothing other than sheer stupidity?

Then the CIA gets routinely discredited, undermined, one of their key covert operatives gets outed, and the subsequent erosion of one of their key organizations decimated who just happen to have been conveniently researching WMD's in Iran. No irony there.

If they really cared about human intelligence resources around the world, why don't they consider a little less bullying and a invoking a boatload more diplomacy so foreigners might even consider for a nanosecond working with us again. I but I forget. These people are incapable of diplomacy."

Yikes. It's just all so counter intuitive.

Okay if I go on my brain will explode.

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think I know the answer.
Hopefully it will prevent any explosions.

The answer is......$$$$$$.

Money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hey wow
Our government has turned in to

A GAME SHOW !!!

When do we all get our NEWWWW CARS ???

It sure ain't a reality show though OTOH machaivellian individuals being rewarded for the worst in so called behaviors through overt greed, incessant misrepresentations, and manipulations does have it's resonance.

Gee and is $$$ really a symbol for money?

You enlighten me all the time my friend. I truly suck at this capitalism stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have to keep it simple.
For my own good. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Now you've gone and inspired an earworm for the
intro bass line to Floyd's "Money"

"doo doo doo doo do do do do do doo doo doo doo do do do do do doo..."

Betchya never knew how to do the keyboard equivalent of morse code for the bass guitar. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. As I see it, national security is concerned with providing security
to the nation. Homeland security is concerned with creating an American KGB.

And there was no 'bad intelligence'. There was only fraudulant intelligence. There were plenty of people providing good intelligence, but they were ignored in favor of what the administration wanted to hear. Which was created by Chalabi and Rummy's OSP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-09-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think you're totally correct on both counts.
The pervasively disingenuous nomenclature just will forever infuriate me though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC