Could Somebody Tell Jerry Springer

[stepnw1f]

that if he is concerned about Dems winning in 2006, he'd better open his eyes to voter irregularities and voter fraud, and stop denying the problem exists. Jesus he gets me peeved sometimes....

[NYCGirl]

1. He takes phone calls. Why don't you call him instead of complaining? NT

[stepnw1f]

3. Because I Can't

I'm at work....

[NoAmericanTaliban]

2. He was also saying that Dems shouldn't bring up - impeachment

of Bush - that Repukes will use this to get their base out. The scare tactic is that if Dems win all they will do is impeach a war-time president. What they are really afraid of is that the Dems will investigate all the corruption going on. I say - rule of law - if someone commits a crime they go to jail. Of course impeaching a wartime president - Clinton - was ok for the GOP.

[MADem]

4. They shouldn't. Impeachment is the END of the line, not the start.

They should aggressively investigate, and then let the chips fall where they may. The GOP likes to impeach without establishing reasons. Sure, we know there's cause, but investigate first, with formal hearings, witnesses, open televised sessions....rule of law.

[Beelzebud]

5. I have two words for Springer listeners:

Stephanie Miller

[tech3149]

6. Momma's got it all

funny, smart, and real fun to look at. Springer just puts me to sleep.

[guruoo]

7. You want peeved? Our local Democratic Party chair not only denies ...

there is a problem, he actually worked behind the scenes
to undermine our efforts to have a paper trail option (available from
the manufacturer) included with new voting machines
recently purchased by our county election commission!

I mean, we even had known Republican commission members raising
questions about the lack of a paper trail, ready to vote
to delay the purchase until the issue could be properly examined.

Yeah, I got you're peeved, man! :freak: