Even Coulter's base is turning against her

[Mike Daniels]

If there was ever a sign that the harpy's time is running out this thread proves it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1629311/posts?q=1&&page=101


Related to the release of her new book and her labeling anyone who believes in Darwinism as a "liberal".

I'm not good at transferring thread comments/replies but I think post 127 (for those interested) show that she's finally even pissing off her loyalists.

[Bluzmann57]

1. How many in her base? About 127?

Christ, nobody in their right mind believes what coulter says.

[Mike Daniels]

4. It may be inflated but the woman has a significant following

If she's finally saying something that pisses them off and finally opens their eyes to the fact that the peroxied shrew is a hack then I'm all for it.

[gratuitous]

2. Boys always feel like that after they orgasm

They feel dirty and ashamed, and transfer those feelings to whatever got them off. They'll be back with Little Arfin' Annie when they get hard up again.

[FuzzyDicePHL]

7. "Little Arfin' Annie"

OMG that's the best nick I've ever heard for that dogfaced skank! (No offense intended towards dogs, natch.) Well done!

[GreenPartyVoter]

3. Now THAT was fun reading! :^D

[Warpy]

5. Maybe as her looks fade (and she's already shopworn)

and the jobs dry up she'll realize there is a problem and get some help.

[MrModerate]

6. Even JoJo the Dog-Faced Boy had a limited run. n/t

[hexola]

8. There is no such thing as "Darwinism"...

Here's why...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=214x50521

"Darwinism" is a fabricated tool of the right...

[dusmcj]

9. giving a shit (or not): a koan

if the usual suspects tried to establish truth by vigorous assertion (as usual)
and no one gave a shit
would the usual suspects still be stupid ?

[Hubert Flottz]

10. How did Foggo know what to order for dAnn, at those "Poker"

sessions?

[warrens]

11. They're not too happy about the deficit, either

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1629303/posts

To: soccer_maniac
If Republicans could just get control of the House, Senate, and Presidency...

Oh wait.




4 posted on 05/09/2006 11:07:53 AM PDT by mc6809e
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: soccer_maniac
Yet our dear friends in the Senate somehow continue to find billions for earmarks...



5 posted on 05/09/2006 11:08:32 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: soccer_maniac
Remember to vote republican so this can't happen. LOL



6 posted on 05/09/2006 11:12:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: soccer_maniac
Even drunken sailors are shaking their heads and saying "Congress, you are way out of control."

7 posted on 05/09/2006 11:15:15 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: mc6809e
Geez, you blame the President for everything !...You must be a DU mole !...Bush is just like Reagan !...
/sarcasm

Some would say a vote for a third party is a vote for a democrat...Given recent experience I would say a vote for a republican is like a vote for a democrat !


8 posted on 05/09/2006 11:15:45 AM PDT by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: soccer_maniac
And yet they say we're mad over immigration and the Iraq War? C'mon! It's the economy stupid!



9 posted on 05/09/2006 11:18:40 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: soccer_maniac
i read somewhere that they justify this by the dollar trending lower. so ten dollars five years from now is worth fifteen today. therefore they are 'reducing' the amount owed by putting it off. /s



10 posted on 05/09/2006 11:19:42 AM PDT by kinoxi
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: kinoxi
"...therefore they are 'reducing' the amount owed by putting it off. /s"

Good gosh, that sounds like something they'd say. I'm not sure the sarcasm tag fits.

BTW, I have read numerous times about how we should still vote for our republican candidates, because it's better than a rat. I'd like to say that if you reward bad behavior, you'll get more of the same. The only way to get their attention is to fire them. Vote 3rd party, vote rat, stay home, whatever works for you. But if you do what you always did, you'll get what you always got.



11 posted on 05/09/2006 11:26:25 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies >

IT'S ALL FALLING TO BITS. Gloriously.

[Patiod]

12. Hee hee - it's fun to watch them debate over creationism

We here at DU have some really stupid disagreements, but "the Bible said so, and if you don't believe it, you're wrong" is not usually the base of our arguments.

[tjwash]

14. Actually, you would be surprised.

There are a lot of hardcore atheists and Libertarians that are completely against religion, over at FR that put up some rather compelling arguments for evolution, and slap down the ID crowd there rather handily.

[Patiod]

16. I saw that - must make for some fun threads

There are some doozy arguments here (ex: drug companies don't want to cure AIDS because they would lose money) but at least you never have to go up against the unwinnable "because the Bible says so".

[mainegreen]

13. I almost feel pity for some of the more rational folk over there.

Almost, except that they of their own free will have chosen to side with some of those twits.

Edited to add this beautiful comment I read over there:
I see that Coulter's undernourished body has finally resorted to burning brain tissue to keep itself going.

:spray:

[paparush]

15. Coulter has a base?

[roguevalley]

17. actually, this is the only interesting thread I've ever been directed

to read over there. Some interesting comments:

"If Humans are animals, then aren't animals humans? It only stands to reason."

All dogs are animals, but not all animals are dogs.

-----

"Then if some uppity geochemist or liberal godless paleostratigrapher tries to describe the physical evidence on Hannity and Colmbes, she can call them all kinds of catchy names like "god hater", "liberal" and "athiest".

Sort of reminiscent of what some people on this thread are doing to Coulter for her beliefs, eh?

-----

Your geochemists and paleostratigraphers are just human beings who will soon enough be rotting in their graves beside the rest of us lesser types, so while you place your faith in the nothingness of human intellect, Coulter's beliefs are rooted to that Which survives for all time. Her faith is lasting and true because true faith is believing that which cannot be seen, that which transcends the meager limits of human intellect. Conversely, the faith of humanism isn't faith at all, it's the antithesis of the true meaning of faith, because in the end they only believe in themselves.

I'd say that Coulter is infinitely smarter than all your Darwinist heros, because she has the wisdom to understand that her intellect, and that of all others, is fallable, imperfect, limited, maleable, and finite. Faith takes the faithful to limits unobtainable by science, liberalism, humanism or atheism.

-----

Coulter's beliefs are rooted to that Which survives for all time.

Really? I had no idea that TV ratings and book sales are rooted in that which survives for all time...
Wait. You *are* aware that Coulter is first and foremost an entertainer, don't you?

-----

To: wideawake

Your arguments from incredulity mean nothing to me. Nothing whatsoever. I've never pretended that science has all the answers yet, nor do I have any problem with that.

Not that I'm conceding your descriptions of the fossil record. What I'm saying is that I reject your arguments from incredulity to begin with.

However, I'll make a deal with you. I will play along with your arguments from incredulity if you first answer a question for me: How do you rationally distinguish God from a phenomenon that does not exist?

-----

Darwinism and the Holy Scriptures are incompatible.

There are arguments galore on FreeRepublic over the evolution/creation debate. But, at the core of the arguments, that basic truth cannot be ignored.

To argue that the tenants of evolution/Darwinism are true is to argue that the Bible is wrong and filled with errors.

Those who argue that both are true are caught in the "No-Man's-Land" of outright inconsistencies and logical dead-ends.

This will be an interesting book.

--------------

To: wideawake

When Isaiah says that people are "like grasshoppers" he is using a simile - he is not saying that people are actually just grasshoppers, but that in comparison to God people are as inconsequential as grasshoppers are in comparison to people.

Actually, I think there is a darker meaning here. Grasshoppers formed a staple of the Middle Eastern diet (and are the only insect considered clean by Jews and Muslims). Therefore likening men to grasshoppers obviously meant that God would occasionally dine upon us.

-----

To: Aquinasfan

The evidence in favor of the evolution is patently overwhelming. It's only ambiguous for those who willfully refuse to see the forest beyond the trees.

-----

[Initech]

18. I hope her book doesnt even sell one copy.

I mean of course, outside of the copies that are ordered in bulk to get her sales numbers up to the top of the New York Times bestseller list, where they sit in warehouses next to the Lost Arc Of The Covenant, collecting dust.

[ComerPerro]

19. I love Creationist logic, as displayed as one of the first posts

Talking about how its not their position to prove a negative.

I always answer to that, "ok, then prove to me right now that God exists".

Thats when, suddenly, it becomes my job to prove a negative, all of a sudden.


Freeper logic: Manipulating your statements and assertions so that you never have to prove anything.

[Initech]

21. Freeperville: Where logic takes a holiday and science isnt longer relevant

[Pissed Off Cabbie]

20. STFU, Ann

This woman should be put to sleep and studied by anthropologists. She might be the missing link.

http://pissedoffcabbie.blogspot.com/2006/04/ms-coulter-please-report-to-re.html

[mainegreen]

22. Again, thanks for that link!

They're still at it, and its better than ever!
*snort*