Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Disappeared Witness: Brownback Cites Witness Who Was Pulled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 12:11 AM
Original message
The Disappeared Witness: Brownback Cites Witness Who Was Pulled
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 12:14 AM by cal04
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: People for the American Way

The Disappeared Witness: Brownback Cites Witness Who Was Pulled to Avoid Embarrassment for Alito Supporters
Earlier today Senator Sam Brownback submitted into the record a letter from Cathy Fleming as evidence that Alito is not biased against individual rights in favor of business and government. Fleming, a former colleague of Samuel Alito, was scheduled to testify on his behalf tomorrow.

Brownback may not have known that Fleming, who is the president-elect of the National Association of Women Lawyers (NAWL) and served under Alito when he was a New Jersey U.S. Attorney, was pulled from the witness list this week after the NAWL released its rating of Alito: “not qualified.”

The NAWL evaluated Alito’s “writings, including his judicial record,” and found that he “has shown a disinclination to protect or advance women's rights.” Furthermore, the organization found that Alito’s “jurisprudence in the area of women's rights has not been restrained” and that “he has too often engaged in strained legal reasoning to effect a narrowing of women's rights beyond the intent of statutes and precedent.”

“Fleming’s absence speaks volumes,” said Ralph G. Neas, president of People For the American Way. “Her organization’s evaluation gets to the very heart of concerns over Alito. Yanking her from the schedule is just one more attempt to sweep inconvenient facts about Alito under the rug.” Neas noted that Chief Justice John Roberts was deemed “qualified” last year by the NAWL. “It’s yet another difference between Alito and Roberts,” he said.

http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0111-05.htm
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=20306
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. She's Just Playing Her Role In The Conspiracy....
and I don't think it's a theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Dems had to pull a witness, too.
Apparently a classmate who was going to offer testimony on Alito's relationship with CAP, but he was so radical in his political views that, unfortunately, to most of America he would have come across as a "nutcase" and done more harm than good. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. just a little
:kick:

for the morning crew.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Updated witness list, without Fleming:
JANUARY 12, 2006
"Supreme Court Witness List for Thursday, January 12, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. "
Senate Judiciary Committee
Full Committee




http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1725
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC