sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:21 PM
Original message |
I JUST CALLED KENNEDY'S OFFICE! |
|
Fienstein is the turncoat, she is the one who will not support a filibuster!
|
txindy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Why is she still in DC, anyway? Besides the money, I mean.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This is war! Why does she do this over and over again? |
|
DiFi needs to get hammered by Dems now. Start dialing.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Call her, but, please edit the attack language. |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 01:24 PM by rucky
better to FAX
Phone: (202) 224-3841 Fax: (202) 228-3954
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I'm not ready to count Feinstien out |
|
That woman receives a ton of money from Women issues group so I find it challenging that she would sell them out.
I think she, like many other democrats, are downplaying the filibuster now so republicans can't go crowing on the news about how they're going to do the "Nuclear Option"
Think of this hearing as a game of Poker. You might be holding four Aces in your hand but you're not going to let them know because you want to build that pot up and make a ton of money.
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. That's what I've been thinking... |
|
...and, quite honestly, I'm glad they're maintaining their poker faces.:thumbsup:
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
This is the fight they've been waiting on their cards for. We have to keep putting pressure on.
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
50. Many Democratic pundits and analysts said the same thing... |
|
...during the Roberts hearings. Keeping their powder dry until the big battle.:thumbsup:
|
hvn_nbr_2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
62. Keep their powder dry. Don't shoot till you see the whites of their... |
|
rectal polyps. By then of course, the powder will all be covered with bullshit.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
78. I got a sinking feeling when Specter spoke of not limiting Dems |
|
question time, because they could see "the light at the end of the tunnel".
I knew in my gut that a compromise had been worked out already. Alito would pass. There was no tension today.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
28. Here's what I think is happening with Feinstein and the filibuster |
|
The biggest thing outside of the Alito hearing is of course Jack Abramoff and the brewing republican scandal. Republicans are desparate to paint democrats as doing the same thing - taking money from Lobbyists and then procurring favors for the group and they would just love to find a few democrats they could paint in that picture.
In comes the Alito hearing. What better way to cull a candidate into the "Money for Votes" scandal then bring up Feinstein and the amount of money she has received from pro-choice groups. Mind you, she's never done anything illegal but to republicans that is something that doesn't matter when you need soundbytes on the evening news.
I have a feeling she's playing off the filibuster so she isn't a part of the evening news. Anything she says and does now isn't going to matter - we just need her vote when it counts!
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
48. Great analysis - and the corporate media would be more than happy |
|
...to assist them in this task. It's best DiFi keeps her head down until it's time to put the pedal to the metal, so to speak.:thumbsup:
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
|
I realize that all of this stuff I'm posting and I could be completely wrong.
But I've seen what happened when Daschle was the minority leader - repukes walked all over us.
Not happening again!
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
|
Just keep putting pressure on him and the others.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
|
the only good thing the repukes ever did was get rid of Daschle. We are 110% so much better without him even though we now are working with less democrats than daschle had at any given time!
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
maybe part of the poker game includes mobilizing US
|
converted_democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
67. I hope you're right, but I've got a bad feeling.. |
|
I understand she gets alot of money from womens groups, but her hubby is making a killing on contracts right now.. If it is about the money, than we are screwed because her family makes a huge sum off of defense contracts. I hope she does what is right, but her family are huge profiteers so I'm not going to count on it. I hope you're right, but I wouldn't bet the house if I were you.
|
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And so many here think her s**t don't stink. I've never thought |
|
that the small amount of good that she does makes up for stuff like this.
|
yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
36. she does well on cultural issues and gun control to cover business |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Out of everyone, SHE should be the one supporting a filibuster. |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 01:26 PM by blm
She is SUPPOSED to be the prochoice female voice on that committee.
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. I am sorry, I am just repeating what Ted's office said |
|
I do not know if the filibuster originates in committee or they check the whole senate, you can call Kennedy yourself.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
She had better be bluffing.:grr:
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
7. BS, it's Hillary Clinton |
|
Wake up everybody. If Hillary Clinton wanted a filibuster, there'd be a filibuster. She is the block in everything, from Iraq to Katrina to Alito. I hate to say it, but maybe we should start hammering away on New York State and make her work to even keep her Senate seat. I'm sick of this shit too.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
and I don't care what she would have to say either, because it would just be some triangulating opportunistic lie. She is creating a persona and Democratic brand for 2008, and "obstructionist" isn't in the picture.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. Hillary is stupid if she doesn't support a filibuster. If she did |
|
she would have women flocking to her in droves for 08.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:38 PM
Original message |
Most women aren't paying attention |
|
And not every woman is pro-choice either. She's probably looked at ALL the numbers on abortion, which is why she's moved to the prevent abortion plan instead of protecting reproductive rights as a principle.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
24. I don't think she's on this committee... |
|
Schumer is, not Hillary...
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. The filibuster happens on the floor |
|
The committee is irrelevant.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
30. Then call both offices! |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. I agree with that n/t |
tiptoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
once again the mighty Hillary has shown her power. :eyes:
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Got the recording with the 2 minute disconnect... |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. Her FAX number is: (202) 228-3954 |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
do you by chance have her California office number handy??
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. SF office - Phone: 415/393-0707 |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
82. I'm just going to write, "FILIBUSTER" really big on a sheet of |
|
paper and fax it.
Says it all.
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Is that what you told Kennedy's office or what they told you? |
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. they told me Feinstein does not support a filibuster |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
84. It's possible that the intern answering the phone doesn't know |
|
what he/she is talking about.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
26. It's what THEY TOLD HER. n/t |
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Still, that leaves enough Dems to hold together a filibuster |
|
And we can deal with DiFi later, during her next election bid.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. We only need 41 to filibuster. |
|
I heard this morning that Snowe, Collins and Chaffee made campaign promises to protect Roe v. Wade and will probably join with the Dems in a filibuster.
|
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
32. is that a real phot of bush kissing Abramoff? I don't think so--no tongue |
Justice Is Comin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Any senator who wants to filibuster can filibuster |
|
it is an inalienable right. No group decision is required. Don't let the staff tell you that stuff.
Strom Thurmond holds the record for 24 hours 18 minutes. He did it all himself. He had a can there to take a pee and took a steam bath prior to starting so that he would dehydrate and could drink without needing to pee.
Just tell Kennedy to get a can over there by the podium.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Just got off the phone with Harry @ 415/393-0707 |
|
at Feinstein's office in California. Told him that is enough, "it's time". He asked for my zip code. Just an FYI.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
37. Did he admit she was not going to join a filibuster or |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
41. I didn't ask... I stated it as a fact that came from Kennedy's office. |
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
52. Thank you. I just did the same. |
|
I feel it is our responsibility to keep Alito from becoming a supreme court judge, simply because he will most likely overturn Roe vs. Wade. And without the option to choose, women will suffer in this country for a long time to come.
That's it. I don't care about anything else. That alone, should keep him out.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
38. where is her email address. sent an email, came back undeliveable |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Hold on here! How do you know this? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
42. Staffer at Kennedy's office. n/t |
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Oh big fuckin surprise |
|
I really despise that woman.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Feinstein Contact info here: |
|
Washington D.C Hart Office Building Room 331 Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-3841 San Francisco One Post Street, Suite 2450 San Francisco CA 94104 (415) 393-0707 Los Angeles 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 915 LA, CA 90025 (310) 914-7300
San Diego 750 "B" Street, Suite 1030 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 231-9712 Fresno 1130 "O" Street, Suite 2446 Fresno, CA 93721 (559) 485-7430
|
katinmn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
44. I called and told them I fully expected Dianne to support |
|
a fillibuster if it comes to that.
She's up for re-election. She better damn well support a fillibuster.
|
huskerlaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
45. So if I call all 6 offices |
|
does my opinion get counted 6 times or are they a bit more organized than that?
I'm so freaking SICK of DiFi, the DINO. I already don't support her re-election, but if she votes against a filibuster... :nuke:
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
47. Called her: (202) 224-3841 |
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
49. you guys are great, I expected a filibuster |
|
I am following this thing, I called Kennedy just to tell him how proud I was, I questioned the filibuster, that is when they informed me of Feinstein.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
51. We need to keep DINO Dianne's phones busy. |
|
She's up for friggin' re-election!
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
|
THE ARROGANCE OF THESE PEOPLE, SHE FIGURES SHE IS A SHOE IN, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE A LIBERAL BEAT HER.
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
75. We will question her stances as a pro-choice candidate then... |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 03:19 PM by calipendence
in the coming election. Her support of this monster that would likely tear down Roe v. Wade shows that she prioritizes corporate cronyism over women's rights to choose! We have to all commit to getting another challenger to her in the coming primary then. Hope it's not too late to get someone good to challenge her then.
Just now called her office and let the staffer now that it's either fillibuster or expect me to vote against her in the upcoming primary.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #75 |
77. I am SO with you on this one. |
|
Her husband is a venture capitalist. They have business in Asia as well as in military contracts. She's just dirty, that's all.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
88. Called Feinsteins office and was told "She will filibuster IF ... |
|
she has EVIDENCE he will overturn Roe V. Wade. I replied - Alito's not going to come out and say it, the evidence is there for anyone looking ... I also said that now is an opportune time to oppose Republicans as public perception is not in their favor!
|
Rainscents
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
54. I just got off the phone with DiFi's office... |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 02:04 PM by Rainscents
Lady said... DiFi hadn't made up her mind, however, she is very concern about womens rights issues! Please everyone, call her office now!!! We also need to call Harry Reids office!!!
|
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
|
Hope they are keeping a TALLY!
:kick:
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
56. Feinstein's contact information |
|
Washington D.C Hart Office Building Room 331 Washington, D.C. 20510 (202) 224-3841
San Francisco One Post Street, Suite 2450 San Francisco CA 94104 (415) 393-0707
Los Angeles 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 915 LA, CA 90025 (310) 914-7300
San Diego 750 "B" Street, Suite 1030 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 231-9712
Fresno 1130 "O" Street, Suite 2446 Fresno, CA 93721 (559) 485-7430
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
59. Thanks... just called her office. |
|
Took a while to get through, but it's possible.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
Stand and Fight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
Rainscents
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
69. I need Kennedy, Reid and Clinton's phone number!!! |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
Strawman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
70. I hope Kennedy, Feingold, Boxer and others will consider walking out |
|
during the floor vote if a filibuster is not possible. Show us that there are some of you who will still fight to the end for our rights. Show the people that there is a Democratic party out there that still has core principles. And leave those so called "moderates" to hang with their Repug buddies.
|
eyesroll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
72. How does "walking out" = "fighting for our rights?" |
|
It's symbolic. There's no actual fight.
I'm not sure if it's the right symbol.
|
Strawman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 03:01 PM by Strawman
It's the only way of symbolically saying we will not be complicit with this. It's a way to show extreme opposition in an extreme circumstance. A roll call vote no will not make the headlines. Nobody will notice. The liberal Dems who give a shit about our rights will just look like a powerless faction. If the others Dems won't filibuster, walk out of the vote in unison. It's a powerful public statement of disapproval.
|
Generator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
81. I know for Christ sakes, hasn't any heard of the sixties?????????/ |
|
People actually used to have to put their life on the line to show they meant they weren't backing down. They actually risked being arrested!
Way to much to expect of a politican, I know.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
76. Call Senator Grassley's office! |
|
Question his commitment towards supporting oversight of FBI and other security agencies if he doesn't ask Alito about his stance on executive power and State Secrets privilege usage in the courts! If he does ask this question, we win big on putting another dent in the armor. If he doesn't we have one more weapon against him in the coming election to question whether his support for Sibel Edmonds and other whistleblowers, etc. is sincere or not. Call him now!
|
Generator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |
79. Can we remove the (F) behind her name |
|
No not the D, that denotes Democrat but the F for female. Because she's betraying more than 50% of all Americans! Way to go Di Fi!
|
xiamiam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
80. just got thru with one try to her San Francisco office...n/t |
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
83. Her staffer I spoke with "does not know." n/t |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
really, I am shocked I tell you!
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
all their lines are a tad busy, not sure if that is a good or bad thing
|
Edgewater_Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
87. Here's An E-mail I Sent To My CA Friends On This |
|
Feel free to cut-and-paste to your friends to get this going.
========================================
Hey all,
I'm e-mailing everyone that I know is in California and/or people I know have friends in California, because from looking at some blogs it appears the Democrats may be getting wobbly about filibustering Sam "My Liege, Bush" Alito -- and the reason may be your senior senator.
At least that's what I've heard from a friend from MA who called Ted Kennedy's office. According to that aide, Sen. Feinstein is against Alito but doesn't support a filibuster -- and if that's the case, word is the Democrats won't even try.
Now, the guy may get in anyway and the Repunks might detonate the "NuKyuLur OpShun" anyway -- but if the Democrats are going down, then Goddammit let's go down swinging!
YOU are the ones that should put Feinstein's feet to the fire. YOU are her constituents. YOU are the ones that need to get everyone you know on the horn or on the e-mail lists to get her to not just oppose Alito, but to SUPPORT a filibuster.
There is too much on the line to do nothing. Do what you can, but DO SOMETHING.
|
caligirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
89. called and kicked. call to DiFi. |
Pachamama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
90. If Feinstein refuses to filibuster, she is dead in CA politics...history.. |
|
And I and many people will work hard from a fundraising and awareness standpoint to guarantee that...
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
91. I just called her, and better yet I'm sending emails to |
|
the fundraisers who keep sending me requests.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |