Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Light pollution in night skies object of new state legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:33 PM
Original message
Light pollution in night skies object of new state legislation
Light pollution in night skies object of new state legislation
By Virginia Wietecha, Carroll County News

CARROLL COUNTY (AR)- Amateur astronomers are delighted with a new shielded outdoor lighting act which was passed by state legislature last year, even though the law has recently been amended to allow small towns the opportunity to exempt themselves if the fixtures are too expensive.

The bill, which was passed to conserve energy and preserve the environment, states that public funds cannot be used to pay for outdoor lights that are not shielded. This includes searchlights, spotlights, floodlights, parking lot lighting, billboards, and street lighting.

“This also affects schools and state offices because they are all paid for with public funds,” said Misty Osborne, Entergy lighting coordinator.

“The refractors inside the actual fixtures point downward with no extra light pointing up,” said Osborne, “and this reduces light pollution.”

http://www.eurekaspringstimesecho.com/articles/2006/05/15/news/we2.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. great!
Not only is this good for astronomy, it makes economic sense. It's cheaper to illuminate less volume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess you could say it was a 'bright' idea...err not so bright :) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC