Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What makes this (NSA program) different from anything Clinton did?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:12 AM
Original message
What makes this (NSA program) different from anything Clinton did?
Edited on Tue May-16-06 09:21 AM by norml
Please leave your answers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chrisbur Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. The NSA is a massive intelligence agency
with massive resources. The best Clinton could do is quietly tiptoe up to doors and put his ear against them or gingerly pick up a second phone line and eavesdrop on Chelsea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm looking for counter arguments I can use on the air.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. I suspect it was the NSA who was into Clinton's shit...
headed up by Herr Starr and the vast RW conspiracy, no doubt. They probably did more eavesdropping on the President than the Prez ordered on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton followed the law. He did not try to throw the Constution out the
window and claim he had to end democracy in order to keep us safe from terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What about Echelon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Under Clinton Echelon was held in check - this 1998 report below is clear
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/05/cyber/articles/27network.html

<snip>...Echelon, a computer system that monitors millions of e-mail, fax, telex and phone messages sent over satellite-based communications systems as well as terrestrial-based data communications. The system was established under what is known as the "UKUSA Agreement" after World War II and includes the security agencies of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Although Echelon was originally set up as an international spy network, lawmakers are concerned that it could be used to eavesdrop on American citizens. <snip>

The finished report will outline the legal bases and other criteria used by United States intelligence agencies when assessing potential wiretap targets. It will be submitted to the House and made available to the public. <snip>

According to the report, Echelon is just one of the many code names for the monitoring system, which consists of satellite interception stations in participating countries. The stations collectively monitor millions of voice and data messages each day. These messages are then scanned and checked against certain key criteria held in a computer system called the "Dictionary." In the case of voice communications, the criteria could include a suspected criminal's telephone number; with respect to data communications, the messages might be scanned for certain keywords, like "bomb" or "drugs." The report also alleges that Echelon is capable of monitoring terrestrial Internet traffic through interception nodes placed on deep-sea communications cables. While few dispute the necessity of a system like Echelon to apprehend foreign spies, drug traffickers and terrorists, many are concerned that the system could be abused to collect economic and political information. <snip>

"If this report reveals that information about American citizens is being collected without legal authorization, the intelligence community will have some serious explaining to do," Barr said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton was investigated
because of suspicion he used a holiday card mailing list inappropriately, compromising personal information.

...and he was pilloried because he fired someone from the WH travel office. And this Bush WH purged the CIA to get rid of non-lapdog career professionals who might have an independent thought....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. One Add In About The Travel Office Thing
Nobody seems to remember (or care) that the management staff of the travel office could not account for $10 million in travel costs. Now, it was investigated, and nobody was ever accused of stealing the money or anything. But, in what other business would one get to mismanage a budget to the tune of $10 million over 9 years, and NOT get fired?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC