Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chertoff on using National Guard on the Border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:43 PM
Original message
Chertoff on using National Guard on the Border
He was on O'Reilly six months ago, and said this:

"Why don't you put the National Guard on the border to back up the border
patrol and stop the bleeding, and then start to increase the Border Patrol,
the high-tech and all of that?" O’Reilly asked. . . .

"Well, the National Guard is really, first of all, not trained for that
mission," Chertoff told O'Reilly. "I mean, the fact of the matter is the
border is a special place. There are special challenges that are faced
there."

Chertoff added that that it would take a huge amount of National Guard
troops, that they would need new training. But couldn’t the National Guard
pull it off, O'Reilly asked?

"I think it would be a horribly over-expensive and very difficult way to
manage this problem," Chertoff said. "Unless you would be prepared to leave
those people in the National Guard day and night for month after month after
month, you would eventually have to come to grips with the challenge in a
more comprehensive way."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick&recommend!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Flip-flop. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Snow said something about the NG not doing security
but doing non law-enforcement tasks like (construction?) which will free up border agents for more intensive patrols. It's a dumb-assed idea to appease the knuckle draggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's a good movie called Flashpoint that deals with Border patrol.
Also it delves into the JFK assasination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Remember in Flashpoint where they had those electronic monitors
that they had to plant in their sector, and there was a screen that they watched to see whether there was any activity. I guess those didn't work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah but we all know he's incompetant
and no one listens to what he says. After all he is just the Head of the Department of Homland Security. It's not like he works at the Pentagon or anything.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I know this is small potatoes in the grand destruction of our country, but
when Clinton was President, if one person expressed any doubt about one of his policies, the news blared with "Disarray in the Clinton Administration!".

This criminal administration has been going off in all directions since the day they took office, and you just never hear that, even now.

You hear that they are demoralized or "grim", but not the chaos with which they characterized the Clinton regime for years.

Grrrr . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually, I agree with you
It's very important because it shows just how clueless the administration is. After all aren't they saying that they have been contemplating this for quite a while. Apparantly they didn't ask Chertoff his opinion since he said it wouldn't work just 6 months ago.

That's why I recommended the post for greatest page. I'm suprised it didn't get more traction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for your recommendation.
I don't know why some people's post don't get traction.

Lots of things kind of get buried under multiple postings of the same stories. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC